• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Petition to ban Dihydrogen monoxide"

Collapse

  • jimjamuk
    replied
    Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Post
    Delegates at Cancun didnt have to think twice about signing a petition banning this substance.

    This chemical is found in our rivers,lakes and in large quantities in the sea. It is fatal if inhaled, a major greenhouse gas and without it there would be no acid rain.

    Dihydrogen monoxide is more commonly known as water, and the petition was a spoof.

    Clearly conferences like this attract all sorts of freeloaders and kooks, but we are entrusting our economy and future to these people. They are supposed to understand the science and help formulate policy, but they will sign up to anything that has the words, ban protect, earth and global in it.

    Cancun kooks

    enough of that sciency stuff - where do i sign?

    Leave a comment:


  • xoggoth
    replied
    WRCS Ditto.

    Leave a comment:


  • EternalOptimist
    replied
    Originally posted by KentPhilip View Post
    But when I was in Cancun the ban was to only affect government organisations; it's not the first time the proposals had been watered down...





    Leave a comment:


  • KentPhilip
    replied
    But when I was in Cancun the ban was to only affect government organisations; it's not the first time the proposals had been watered down...

    Leave a comment:


  • ThomasSoerensen
    replied
    Originally posted by RichardCranium View Post


    Anyone at a conference on climate change who falls for that gag should be publicly disgraced, dismissed from office, gagged from ever speaking to the media and forbidden to participate in academic journal production.

    And then beaten up.
    WHS

    Leave a comment:


  • suityou01
    replied
    Send it over I'll sign it.

    Leave a comment:


  • doodab
    replied
    Originally posted by RichardCranium View Post
    You mean like in Germany where if you don't clear the pavement outside your house, you get fined?

    Our councils would just use it as a revenue-raising exercise (you'd get a ticket stuck on your door if it snowed while you were out at work) and they'd put the council tax up to pay for the Snow Enforcement Officers.

    I think it would have to be an "EU Diktat".

    Ice and snow removal requirements | Germany | Winterdienst - Schneeräumen | The German Way

    I'm glad I live in a block with someone that does it, that sounds fairly onerous.

    Leave a comment:


  • RichardCranium
    replied
    Originally posted by doodab View Post
    I reckon anyone who could successfully implement a temporary ban on crystalline dihydrogen monoxide would be quite popular at the moment.
    You mean like in Germany where if you don't clear the pavement outside your house, you get fined?

    Our councils would just use it as a revenue-raising exercise (you'd get a ticket stuck on your door if it snowed while you were out at work) and they'd put the council tax up to pay for the Snow Enforcement Officers.

    Leave a comment:


  • doodab
    replied
    I reckon anyone who could successfully implement a temporary ban on crystalline dihydrogen monoxide would be quite popular at the moment.

    Leave a comment:


  • RichardCranium
    replied


    Anyone at a conference on climate change who falls for that gag should be publicly disgraced, dismissed from office, gagged from ever speaking to the media and forbidden to participate in academic journal production.

    And then beaten up.

    Leave a comment:


  • mudskipper
    replied
    Who's sockie is he?

    Leave a comment:


  • minestrone
    replied
    How much for 2?

    Leave a comment:


  • EternalOptimist
    started a topic Petition to ban Dihydrogen monoxide

    Petition to ban Dihydrogen monoxide

    Delegates at Cancun didnt have to think twice about signing a petition banning this substance.

    This chemical is found in our rivers,lakes and in large quantities in the sea. It is fatal if inhaled, a major greenhouse gas and without it there would be no acid rain.

    Dihydrogen monoxide is more commonly known as water, and the petition was a spoof.

    Clearly conferences like this attract all sorts of freeloaders and kooks, but we are entrusting our economy and future to these people. They are supposed to understand the science and help formulate policy, but they will sign up to anything that has the words, ban protect, earth and global in it.

    Cancun kooks

Working...
X