Originally posted by sasguru
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Is there anything more weak-minded and meaningless than having "faith"?"
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by sasguru View PostI could take part of MF's brain, but then there would be a rattling sound everytime I shook my head.Originally posted by cailin maith View PostEven louder than the one we all hear now?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by sasguru View PostI could take part of MF's brain, but then there would be a rattling sound everytime I shook my head.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by xoggoth View PostCUK be simpler if anyone having one set of views on issue A was legally obliged to hold certain views on issue B. I always agree with sas on religion and disagree on politics and then it's the other way round with MF. Can you two please undergo some brain part swap? It would be so much easier. Ta.
Leave a comment:
-
CUK be simpler if anyone having one set of views on issue A was legally obliged to hold certain views on issue B. I always agree with sas on religion and disagree on politics and then it's the other way round with MF. Can you two please undergo some brain part swap? It would be so much easier. Ta.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by xoggoth View PostIs The Book of Dave any better than that other Will Self thing where a bloke woke up to find he was a monkey? Crap.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by doodab View PostWhere in the bible is the bit that specifically forbids group sex?Originally posted by contractor79 View Postsee if you had gone to school assembly instead of reading the Beano you wouldn't ask questions as stupid as thatOriginally posted by doodab View PostWell, I've read quite a bit of the bible too, and I don't remember anything that would prohibit group sex, although I can understand that wife swapping might be a no go.
Leave a comment:
-
Is The Book of Dave any better than that other Will Self thing where a bloke woke up to find he was a monkey? Crap.
Leave a comment:
-
what a load of nonsense
Writers have always tended to support fiction with invented and apparently credible histories or else embroidered in real facts in order to give the tale more credibility and depth. What would the film "The Mummy" be if the mummy simply popped up in the desert with no explanation of who he had been, how he came to be an evil creature etc?
Involve religion and you then get vested interest in showing the story to be true and reality is used selectively to "prove" it. How often is some other reference cited to show the truth of the Bible? It may well demonstrate the truth of that part of the Bible, it is very probable that much of the bible is based on real events, but nothing else proves any supernatural aspect of it. The cuckolded Pharaoh in "The Mummy" was a real character but does that make the rest of it true?Last edited by xoggoth; 8 December 2010, 14:48.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Platypus View PostIn my opinion, if there IS a God, he would NOT want us blindly following self-appointed religious teachers.
Isn't it a sin to suppose the mind of God?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by doodab View PostHave you read The Book of Dave?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by xoggoth View PostAnd why would he give us the capacity to think for oursleves and then expect us to blindly follow what religious teachers tell us?
Isn't it a sin to suppose the mind of God?
Leave a comment:
-
"Is there anything more weak-minded and meaningless than having "faith"?."
I just hope Ponting can start playing cricket.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Secondary NI threshold sinking to £5,000: a limited company director’s explainer Today 09:51
- Reeves sets Spring Statement 2025 for March 26th Yesterday 09:18
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
- Accounting for Contractors Dec 19 15:30
- Chartered Accountants with MarchMutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants with March Mutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants Dec 19 15:05
- Unfairly barred from contracting? Petrofac just paid the price Dec 19 09:43
- An IR35 case law look back: contractor must-knows for 2025-26 Dec 18 09:30
- A contractor’s Autumn Budget financial review Dec 17 10:59
Leave a comment: