Reply to: Blog

[BdP]

CUK was namechecked in today's edition.....

Here.

Hey, I got a mention! How were the tyres today

[MarillionFan]

Personally I prefer HABS Tweets.

**** **** ****ity **** **** **** ****ity ****ity tulip

[Spacecadet]

I liked this observation about comments on the Royal Wedding announcement:

What was noticeable was that on both The Guardian and Daily Mail's sites, among the first comments was: "Are we having to pay for this?"
Mail readers, of course, love royal weddings but object to anything that costs taxpayers money while Guardian readers love public sector spending but hate royalty.
Unlike The Sun comments section, where the best one for me was 'Is Kate up the duff then?' Don't you just love the earthy humour of the plebs.

[thunderlizard]

CUK was namechecked in today's edition.....

Here.

No it wasn't.

[Lockhouse]

I totally agree. A desperate attempt at "Mashism". Avoid.

CUK was namechecked in today's edition.....

Here.

[d000hg]

I though the one about the Beatles was quite good.

The newest one? Oh.

[Dearnla]

"CUK Forum - always an impartial view"

[Lockhouse]

I love you guys!

[SupremeSpod]

Thanks for the feedback - will pass on!

Can you pass this on.... Get a real job, ya bum!

Ftfy.

[kandr]

Thanks for the feedback - will pass on!

Can you pass this on.... Stop writing a load of twaddle.

[Lockhouse]

Would you mind pointing out a sample post which qualifies as either funny or entertaining? Judged on the couple I read, hoping for both seems unrealistic.

I though the one about the Beatles was quite good.

[Lockhouse]

Thanks for the feedback - will pass on!

[administrator]

No problem posting this - as long as happy to receive the criticism it is likely to draw

1 - About me - "pseudo intellectual" puts me right off him to start with. Am sure he is a nice guy but to describe himself as this =

2 - Paragraph spacing. Sort it out.

3 - Did not grab me. An article title "Tits", clicked on it, brain disengaged very quickly. Don't know why. Maybe because there were no tits.

[kandr]

My mate who used to write for The Sun has just started a wildly funny and hugely entertaining blog. Solly's Blog.

Mods - please delete if I'm not allowed to do this. Apologies in advance.

I got to the part "he used to wrote for The Sun", enough said.

[BdP]

Would you mind pointing out a sample post which qualifies as either funny or entertaining? Judged on the couple I read, hoping for both seems unrealistic.

I totally agree. A desperate attempt at "Mashism". Avoid.