• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "I can't get my head round this"

Collapse

  • d000hg
    replied
    Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
    Big fish in a thick pond syndrome? He's a somebody in the Labour pond.
    When you're worth $1bn, you're a somebody in any pond.

    He seems to genuinely support them, IMO.

    Leave a comment:


  • gingerjedi
    replied
    Originally posted by TonyEnglish View Post
    What I don't get about him is how he got to where he is. His products were/are sh1t!
    By supplying Rupert Murdoch's evil tory supporting empire with millions of cheap Sky boxes.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sysman
    replied
    Originally posted by TonyEnglish View Post
    What I don't get about him is how he got to where he is. His products were/are sh1t!
    Pile 'em high. Sell 'em cheap.

    True barrow boy fashion.

    Leave a comment:


  • BoredBloke
    replied
    What I don't get about him is how he got to where he is. His products were/are sh1t!

    Leave a comment:


  • Sysman
    replied
    Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
    Big fish in a thick pond syndrome? He's a somebody in the Labour pond.
    and the whole Labour-Meeja love-in got him his own telly show.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sysman
    replied
    Originally posted by Spacecadet View Post
    Amstrad CEO resigns over Sir Sugar's emailer obsession ? The Register

    I'm surprised Sur Alun didn't get fired over this.
    That article is 9 years old.

    To put the device into perspective, I got broadband 6 months later.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by Peoplesoft bloke View Post
    why the flip do you think Labour would have increased taxes any more than the Tories have/are going to ?
    Read their manifesto retard - Laboour says deficit will be reduced mainly by tax raises and in the second place by spending cuts, the Tories and Lib Dems said the other way around. It would not have been a big deal had it not been for deficit running so high thanks to Nu Liebor debts.

    Leave a comment:


  • Peoplesoft bloke
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    Not raising taxes massively (like Labour would have done) is the same as cutting them.

    HTH
    Hilarious - I was talking about history not your made-up version of what you think would have happened - why the flip do you think Labour would have increased taxes any more than the Tories have/are going to ? Certainly not on the experience of history, that much is certain.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by Peoplesoft bloke View Post
    With any luck he does it to annoy pathetic thrusting aspirant no-hoper Tories who misguidedly think Tories cut taxes (just as one example) when they clearly do not.
    Not raising taxes massively (like Labour would have done) is the same as cutting them.

    HTH

    Leave a comment:


  • Peoplesoft bloke
    replied
    Originally posted by Doggy Styles View Post
    For a bloke who is driven by cost control, free enterprise and cutting through bullsh1t and red tape, why on earth does Lord Suralan support the Labour party?
    With any luck he does it to annoy pathetic thrusting aspirant no-hoper Tories who misguidedly think Tories cut taxes (just as one example) when they clearly do not.

    Leave a comment:


  • Spacecadet
    replied
    Amstrad CEO resigns over Sir Sugar's emailer obsession ? The Register

    I'm surprised Sur Alun didn't get fired over this.
    Last edited by Spacecadet; 10 November 2010, 23:52.

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    Big fish in a thick pond syndrome? He's a somebody in the Labour pond.

    Leave a comment:


  • Wodewick
    replied
    Originally posted by Doggy Styles View Post
    For a bloke who is driven by cost control, free enterprise and cutting through bullsh1t and red tape, why on earth does Lord Suralan support the Labour party?
    Errr dunno nothing stands out

    Leave a comment:


  • Doggy Styles
    started a topic I can't get my head round this

    I can't get my head round this

    For a bloke who is driven by cost control, free enterprise and cutting through bullsh1t and red tape, why on earth does Lord Suralan support the Labour party?

Working...
X