Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "It couldn't happen to a nicer bloke..."
Harriet Harman, the party’s deputy leader, said his legal challenge would not be supported and added: “It is no part of Labour’s politics to try to win elections by telling lies.”
That's far more untrue than anything said by any party during the election.
What I can't understand is why just Woolas. I bet every single election leaflet put out contains deliberately misleading statements about the opposition parties and their candidates.
Do you think if we examined them all we could get the whole bastard lot removed?
What I can't understand is why just Woolas. I bet every single election leaflet put out contains deliberately misleading statements about the opposition parties and their candidates.
Do you think if we examined them all we could get the whole bastard lot removed?
You make some very valid points xog. However, this is Woolas. A piece of slimy refuse.
In his case I, for one, am willing to forego democratic privilege and inherent fairness to stitch the two-faced self-serving charlatan up!!
The difficulty in cases like this is that, after a news story has blown up, you can never find any background to try and find the facts. (Why doesn't Google have a sort by before a given date?) There is a letter from Woolas here.
Indeed, although whether his claims were entirely groundless I am not sure. An alleged campaign by Muslims to “take Phil out”? I have little doubt that such a campaign existed. If you ever looked at some Muslim sites before the election, agendas to get in MPs favourable to them existed.
There isn't anything wrong with that, every group tends to campaign for the MPS they want and they are entitled to, it's part of democracy. So why was it wrong for Woolas's people to mention it in this context? Christian and atheists concerned by the growth of islamic values in their constituency should have an equal right to oppose them but they are not allowed that right of course. Woolas may in part be a victim of politically correct attitudes based on the inverted racism that his government promoted.
Leave a comment: