Originally posted by vetran
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: It's me hooman right!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "It's me hooman right!"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by vetran View PostSorry an offshore tax dodging scheme has anyone told the Government efficiency monitor.
Leave a comment:
-
-
Sorry an offshore tax dodging scheme has anyone told the Government efficiency monitor.
If he carried on past 2008 then he is an idiot prior to that he was only as guilty as anyone taking out an ISA. OK we knew HMRC didn't like it but they don't like much!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by scooterscot View PostMy argument was not one of equivalence, not by any means, but rather a comparison. Incidentally this is not an argument, it's a contradiction.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Peoplesoft bloke View PostEr.... well you did.
My point was that if you argue equivalence between retrospective legislation and dodgy offshore schemes and call the proponents of one scum, then surely by definition, the proponents of the eqivalent are scum too?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by scooterscot View PostUsing that logic you'd have to call offshore consultants Tax Dodging Scum.
My point was that if you argue equivalence between retrospective legislation and dodgy offshore schemes and call the proponents of one scum, then surely by definition, the proponents of the eqivalent are scum too?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Peoplesoft bloke View PostUsing that logic you'd have to call HMRC Retrospective Tax Collecting Scum.
There's taking Michael and there's taking the the pi$$
The government such as ours 20th in the league table of corrupt countries of the world, is it really surprising they want to get their pound of flesh whichever way they can?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by scooterscot View PostTDS
The retrospective part is just as incredible as a UK resident thinking it's ok to maintain an offshore managed income.
What were those people thinking?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
Victim or tax dodging scum?
The retrospective part is just as incredible as a UK resident thinking it's ok to maintain an offshore managed income.
What were those people thinking?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
Victim or tax dodging scum?have taken over it.
This will be Human Rights Legislation (which I am generally in favour of) used correctly if he wins.
*Invested in a questionable offshore scheme.Last edited by Peoplesoft bloke; 4 November 2010, 19:32.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Yesterday 05:05
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 23 21:05
- IR35: Mutuality Of Obligations — updated for 2025/26 Sep 23 05:22
- Only proactive IT contractors can survive recruitment firm closures Sep 22 07:32
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Sep 19 07:16
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Sep 18 21:16
- IR35: Substitution — updated for 2025/26 Sep 18 05:45
- Payment request to bust recruitment agency — free template Sep 16 21:04
- Why licensing umbrella companies must be key to 2027’s regulation Sep 16 13:55
- Top 5 Chapter 11 JSL myths contractors should know Sep 15 03:46
Leave a comment: