Originally posted by OwlHoot
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Welcome to 2007
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Welcome to 2007"
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by OwlHoot View PostAIUI the original sub-prime problem wasn't so much the dodgy lending per se, but that this was hidden and disguised within portfolios of supposedly sounder loans, the financial equivalent of mixing radioactive waste with household refuse.
The John Bird and John Fortune piece on it is still the best explanation that I have seen going. linky (It is SFW but not if work does not like YouTube)
Originally posted by Doggy Styles View PostIf banks want to take the risk, I hope its only small institutions like Kensington and Precise, we don't bail them out if it goes tits up.
There is nothing wrong with lending money to higher risk customers provided that everyone involved is aware of the risk they are taking. If it all goes tits up then the taxpayer should not be bailing them out.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by OwlHoot View PostAIUI the original sub-prime problem wasn't so much the dodgy lending per se, but that this was hidden and disguised within portfolios of supposedly sounder loans, the financial equivalent of mixing radioactive waste with household refuse.
If banks want to take the risk, I hope its only small institutions like Kensington and Precise, we don't bail them out if it goes tits up.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Clippy View Post
Leave a comment:
-
We say 'overlooked by the high street'
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Clippy View Post
"Figures today from the Bank of England revealed that net new mortgage lending (not including redemptions and repayments) in September was £112m, down from £1.62bn in August. "
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How you think you look on LinkedIn vs what recruiters see Today 09:00
- Reports of umbrella companies’ death are greatly exaggerated Nov 28 10:11
- A new hiring fraud hinges on a limited company, a passport and ‘Ade’ Nov 27 09:21
- Is an unpaid umbrella company required to pay contractors? Nov 26 09:28
- The truth of umbrella company regulation is being misconstrued Nov 25 09:23
- Labour’s plan to regulate umbrella companies: a closer look Nov 21 09:24
- When HMRC misses an FTT deadline but still wins another CJRS case Nov 20 09:20
- How 15% employer NICs will sting the umbrella company market Nov 19 09:16
- Contracting Awards 2024 hails 19 firms as best of the best Nov 18 09:13
- How to answer at interview, ‘What’s your greatest weakness?’ Nov 14 09:59
Leave a comment: