Reply to: Happy Climate Fool's Day

[EternalOptimist]

You really are very limited aren't you? And you don't even know it.

I'd rather be a hammer than a nail
yesss I woulld
oh yeeess I woooould
if I couuuld
I surely wouuulldd

I 'd rather be a fart in a hurricane
than a pea-brain

oh yes I woooood


if I coooould

[shaunbhoy]

You really are very limited aren't you? And you don't even know it.

[sasguru]

What has concensus got to do with science ?? why are you laughing ?

There is no place in science for concensus, concensus is a political phrase and a political tool. Its a way for crooks to side-step debate
Science is about producing falsifiable theories, verifiable results and does not rely on a popularity contest.

the author of that piece was right, forget concensus, bring me the proof


pea brain

You really are very limited aren't you? And you don't even know it.

[Boudica]

What has concensus got to do with science ?? why are you laughing ?

There is no place in science for concensus, concensus is a political phrase and a political tool. Its a way for crooks to side-step debate
Science is about producing falsifiable theories, verifiable results and does not rely on a popularity contest.

the author of that piece was right, forget concensus, bring me the proof


pea brain

pea brain!!!!

insult of the week!!!

[Spacecadet]

anthropomorphic CO2

I'd pay to see that.

Its what comes out of the Soylent Green factory chimneys

[hyperD]

anthropomorphic CO2 - I'd pay to see that.

[GreenLabel]

What has concensus got to do with science ?? why are you laughing ?

There is no place in science for concensus, concensus is a political phrase and a political tool. Its a way for crooks to side-step debate
Science is about producing falsifiable theories, verifiable results and does not rely on a popularity contest.

the author of that piece was right, forget concensus, bring me the proof


pea brain

Consensus: What we use in lieu of proof. Anyone requesting proof of AGW should be referred to the sacred consensus.

* AGW Believers Manual, 3rd Edition, Appendix D: Glossary.

[thunderlizard]

anthropomorphic CO2

I'd pay to see that.

[EternalOptimist]

The credibility of the author is destroyed by this piece of nonsense however:

"I know what you’re thinking and I’ve heard about the “consensus” too. But when you can actually prove something you don’t need a consensus. That’s why you never hear about the consensus on gravity, or the consensus on evolution."



Although I'm sure ignorant cretins like SB don't see what is wrong with that statement at all.

What has concensus got to do with science ?? why are you laughing ?

There is no place in science for concensus, concensus is a political phrase and a political tool. Its a way for crooks to side-step debate
Science is about producing falsifiable theories, verifiable results and does not rely on a popularity contest.

the author of that piece was right, forget concensus, bring me the proof


pea brain

[shaunbhoy]

I wasn't aware there was anybody left who still believed in this crap.

There is. The gullible beanhead that is sasguru.

[GreenLabel]

I wasn't aware there was anybody left who still believed in this crap.

[hyperD]

The credibility of the author is destroyed by this piece of nonsense however:

"...But when you can actually prove something you don’t need a consensus. That’s why you never hear about the consensus on gravity, or the consensus on evolution."

I agree. In the same sense as anyone in the AGW camp that emphatically states "the science is settled".

[hyperD]

Windmills.

Enough said.

[BlasterBates]

I did read somewhere that the several billion Germany had spent on it's renewables would delay global warming by 2 minutes.

[sasguru]

I enjoyed that article immensely

The credibility of the author is destroyed by this piece of nonsense however:

"I know what you’re thinking and I’ve heard about the “consensus” too. But when you can actually prove something you don’t need a consensus. That’s why you never hear about the consensus on gravity, or the consensus on evolution."



Although I'm sure ignorant cretins like SB don't see what is wrong with that statement at all.