• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "If you're tall, feel your balls regularly"

Collapse

  • TimberWolf
    replied
    1 in 200 is still a lot though. The same affect isn't seen in tall women, except in 100m runners and shot-putters, often Russian.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mich the Tester
    replied
    Originally posted by MrRobin View Post
    Stupid hacks sensationalising statistics that they don't understand!

    Using the relative/proportional risk increase to illustrate the affect of x on incidence of disease y in these situations where the original risk is tiny is a nonsense.

    For example, overall risk of developing disease is 1 in 210 or about 0.5%
    Average height of US male = 5' 10''
    Risk of developing disease of 6' male = 0.5%
    6'2'' male = 0.6%
    6'4'' male = 0.7%

    i.e. still tiny.

    Even if you're a 9' giant it's still only 1.7%



    (assumes relative risk increases are not compounding)
    Yes, we know, but you should never let facts get in the way of playing with your balls.

    Anyway, Spod's about 11 foot tall.

    Leave a comment:


  • MrRobin
    replied
    Stupid hacks sensationalising statistics that they don't understand!

    Using the relative/proportional risk increase to illustrate the affect of x on incidence of disease y in these situations where the original risk is tiny is a nonsense.

    For example, overall risk of developing disease is 1 in 210 or about 0.5%
    Average height of US male = 5' 10''
    Risk of developing disease of 6' male = 0.5%
    6'2'' male = 0.6%
    6'4'' male = 0.7%

    i.e. still tiny.

    Even if you're a 9' giant it's still only 1.7%



    (assumes relative risk increases are not compounding)

    Leave a comment:


  • SupremeSpod
    replied
    Originally posted by DaveB View Post
    I have a reciprocal arrangement with MrsB.

    She does my balls, I do her boobs
    That's the last time I shake her hand!

    Leave a comment:


  • DaveB
    replied
    I have a reciprocal arrangement with MrsB.

    She does my balls, I do her boobs

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Greg
    replied
    Originally posted by filthy1980 View Post
    i check daily

    even hourly on a good day
    I think the OP is talking about one's own balls.

    Leave a comment:


  • Scrag Meister
    replied
    Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
    Quick cut me off at the knees!

    Leave a comment:


  • Mich the Tester
    replied
    Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
    Pull yer finger out Wikileaks.
    Were they feeling their balls at Wikileaks?

    Leave a comment:


  • original PM
    replied
    Like theres a man alive that doesn't?


    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    If suitably anonymised data were publicly available these kinds of statistical relationships would likely be discovered quickly. Physical attributes, lifestyle, occupation, family history, disorders, etc. Pull yer finger out Wikileaks.

    Leave a comment:


  • filthy1980
    replied
    i check daily

    even hourly on a good day

    Leave a comment:


  • thunderlizard
    replied
    It might be because taller men are further away from their testicles, making self-checking slightly more difficult.

    Leave a comment:


  • kandr
    replied
    Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
    Because tall men (like myself) get more pussy. All that bumping causes it.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mich the Tester
    started a topic If you're tall, feel your balls regularly

    If you're tall, feel your balls regularly

    Eek



Working...
X