Originally posted by NotAllThere
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Some people take this "Thatch" hatred too far"
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by sasguru View PostNext time you could save time by taking my sig to heart.
It is, in tandem with so much of what you contribute, completely devoid of any trace of humour, pertinence, or originality of thought.
Keep on trying though, the forum loves a trier.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Peoplesoft bloke View PostHmm what if Bob Showwaddwadi ran the railways ?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by amcdonald View PostExcept Bob Crow
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Bagpuss View PostYou know, they say someone knows that have lost an argument when they result to insults, never mind I'll give you another chance, given your anger issues. I know 'manufacturing' provided bigger tax revenues under Blair than the city of London did, but that's not manufacturing as Germany would know it. We are talking largely components, which isn't so impressive.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Postthe point is, even the professionals see it as rather pointless.
good for pub talk and thats about it
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Bagpuss View PostOK pull the plug on industry and pretend it's inevitable, doesn't seem to be the case for Germany however, their manufacturing has gone from strength to strength but then they were not such Milton Freeman zealots. Even the man himself realised his own failings.
Milton Friedman
The sad thing is that they were happy to leave all those workers with nothing to do. Some form of the back to work schemes mentioned in other threads recently could have helped greatly here, before the cost became so great.
Thought for the day. I can remember council house estates which had beautiful gardens. Hmm, decent homes that people whose economics circumstances meant they shouldn't be buying could have pride in where they lived.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by SupremeSpod View PostYou have never met the woman yet you have a "Personal" as well as "ideological" dislike for her?
How bizarre.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by NotAllThere View PostAnd the downside was?
I graduated July 1990. I had a grant. Thatcher departed 22nd November 1990. So she must have abolished the grant in those last four months then? er... no. the grant was abolished in 1999 under the New Labour government.
I was fortunate to go to uni just before the fees were introduced.
Since then labour have done their best to force young people into a state of debt and at the same time devalue the very degrees they have got massively into debt for.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Peoplesoft bloke View PostNo
How bizarre.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Peoplesoft bloke View PostWhat is your point?
good for pub talk and thats about it
Leave a comment:
-
-
Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Postwhat if? aka 'the counter-factual concept' in history. I used to do it as a historian - its about as much use as a global warming model
= fck all squared
Leave a comment:
-
Lets face it, just suppose Labour had be in power since 1979, would the pits be open? would the steelworks be open? would they have done it in a painless way? I somehow doubt it. Of course they wouldn't have done it straight away they would have waited a bit until it all started fall apart, and because it would be unplanned and chaotic there wouldn't have been an orderly change to new industries.
In Germany the most painful reform was done by the SPD (the socialist party) simply because it all began to fall apart on their watch.
Gerhardt Schroeder is hated almost as much as Thatcher is.
It's just the mugs who happened to be in power at the time.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How you think you look on LinkedIn vs what recruiters see Today 09:00
- Reports of umbrella companies’ death are greatly exaggerated Nov 28 10:11
- A new hiring fraud hinges on a limited company, a passport and ‘Ade’ Nov 27 09:21
- Is an unpaid umbrella company required to pay contractors? Nov 26 09:28
- The truth of umbrella company regulation is being misconstrued Nov 25 09:23
- Labour’s plan to regulate umbrella companies: a closer look Nov 21 09:24
- When HMRC misses an FTT deadline but still wins another CJRS case Nov 20 09:20
- How 15% employer NICs will sting the umbrella company market Nov 19 09:16
- Contracting Awards 2024 hails 19 firms as best of the best Nov 18 09:13
- How to answer at interview, ‘What’s your greatest weakness?’ Nov 14 09:59
Leave a comment: