Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "New Navy aircraft carrier will never carry jets"
My thoughts are that this is just the tories playing politics in proximity to the spending review. They know that defence is too important in the world today to be compromised, but to prioritise defence in public right now would anger the electorate. Wait until the cuts are under-way and the economy showing signs of recovery, and then expect to see new cash for harriers found under the sofa cushions at No10
OH FFS - those proper carriers are like what, £3 bln each? That's like cost of two aircraft carriers paid in bonuses every year in the City - I say bite the bullet and tax 100% of bonuses (retrospectively so that they are not avoidable) to build those carriers, to make up for it call them using two bank names that paid the most tax.
AtW in "sensible solutions to complex problems" mode.
The Government’s Strategic Defence and Security Review will also confirm that Britain will not have an effective “carrier strike” capability – a working aircraft carrier equipped with fighter jets – until 2020.
David Cameron had wanted to scrap one of the two carriers, the largest and most expensive vessels in British naval history, but the review found that contracts signed by the previous government meant that doing so would end up costing the taxpayer more than going ahead with both. As a result, the two carriers will enter service, but one will be mothballed as soon as possible.
OH FFS - those proper carriers are like what, £3 bln each? That's like cost of two aircraft carriers paid in bonuses every year in the City - I say bite the bullet and tax 100% of bonuses (retrospectively so that they are not avoidable) to build those carriers, to make up for it call them using two bank names that paid the most tax.
AtW in "sensible solutions to complex problems" mode.
Leave a comment: