• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Homebuyers could be forced to pay bigger deposits in plan to cap mortgage lending"

Collapse

  • shaunbhoy
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    What am I jealous of? Your wit, SK's objectivity or AtW's brains?
    Quite probably, all three.

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Originally posted by shaunbhoy View Post
    You are only jealous that you are yet to discover someone more stupid than you.
    Although AtW runs you close.
    What am I jealous of? Your wit, SK's objectivity or AtW's brains?

    Leave a comment:


  • shaunbhoy
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    SB, I don't think you should side with SK. It's a rare opportunity for you to fight someone more stupid than you.
    You are only jealous that you are yet to discover someone more stupid than you.
    Although AtW runs you close.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    EDIT: SB, I don't think you should side with SK. It's a rare opportunity for you to fight someone more stupid than you.
    He does not fight his own kind.

    HTH

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Originally posted by SofaKingdom View Post
    The board is there to be used by all it's members as they so desire unless instructed otherwise by a moderator.
    And yet you object to me posting my opinion. What an appropriate insight into your tiny little mind, you petty troll.


    EDIT: SB, I don't think you should side with SK. It's a rare opportunity for you to fight someone more stupid than you.
    Last edited by d000hg; 30 August 2010, 20:10.

    Leave a comment:


  • shaunbhoy
    replied
    Originally posted by SofaKingdom View Post
    Are you a new moderator, the people police or just a twat? The board is there to be used by all it's members as they so desire unless instructed otherwise by a moderator.
    You'll have to excuse d00rkg. He is on a bit of a crusade these days. Trouble is, he bumbles from one thread to another trying to be relevant, but fails spectacularly. He troggles along at rock bottom, occasionally stopping to dig.

    Leave a comment:


  • SofaKingdom
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    Hey dummy, you already posted about mortgage deposit levels today: http://forums.contractoruk.com/gener...mortgages.html Why not resist the urge to start a new thread every time you have a thought (4 or 5 a day is too many threads, but too few thoughts).
    Are you a new moderator, the people police or just a twat? The board is there to be used by all it's members as they so desire unless instructed otherwise by a moderator.

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    So what? It's not possible to discuss another article in the same thread when it's about the same subject?

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    It was different article from The Telegraph.

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Hey dummy, you already posted about mortgage deposit levels today: http://forums.contractoruk.com/gener...mortgages.html Why not resist the urge to start a new thread every time you have a thought (4 or 5 a day is too many threads, but too few thoughts).

    Leave a comment:


  • Homebuyers could be forced to pay bigger deposits in plan to cap mortgage lending

    Mortgage lending could be ‘capped’ to stop borrowers taking out insecure loans, according to a senior Bank of England official.

    The Bank’s Deputy Governor Charlie Bean said ‘direct constraints’ may be needed to restrict access to credit.

    This could mean homebuyers being forced to put down sizeable deposits - for example, between 10 and 25 per cent of the home’s value - before being approved for a mortgage by their banks or building societies. (AtW's comment: FFS, wasn't that amount more or less just recently?)

    It is the first time that a senior official has indicated that the Bank may intervene directly with new rules to stop risky lending.

    It is one of the possible new powers handed to the Bank under the government’s proposed restructuring in its Financial Services Bill due later this year.

    More: Homebuyers could be forced to pay bigger deposits in plan to cap mortgage lending | Mail Online
Working...
X