• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Bank of England Governor warns that Britons face higher inflation for longer"

Collapse

  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    Didn't they cease QE some months ago?
    0.5% rate when inflation is well over 4-5% is QE in itself.

    I doubt they stopped buying gilts by proxy (banks buy it from Govt to show good take up on Govt debt and resell to BoE straight away for a big fat commission), that's QE v2.

    QE v3 will be when BoE starts buying repoed houses.

    HTH

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Originally posted by Not So Wise View Post
    Inflation will not stop until the "quantitative easing" (read: Printing money like there is no tomorrow) stops. Longer it goes on worse the inflation will get. When it stops and when/if pound recovers inflation will slow down, not before
    Didn't they cease QE some months ago?

    Seems a boring story. Inflation is falling, they just hoped it'd fall faster.

    Leave a comment:


  • lilelvis2000
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    The truth is that they are REALLY worried about deflation... of house prices!
    Yes, making sure that we all still think we're rich and pay those ridiculous house prices of which 80%+ is mortgaged at very high rates. A nice way to keep friends happy don'tcha think?

    Leave a comment:


  • lilelvis2000
    replied
    Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
    Get rid of it. There's more than enough to watch on terrestrial + Freeview & Freesat. I was glad to get shot of it.
    We're on the free SKY. which gives us more than we need to - including those nasty Bollywood channels above 790. A few months ago SKY wanted £20 off us for a new card - all so we could enjoy Five and Fiver. So now we don't have Five and I can't say that we miss it.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by lilelvis2000 View Post
    When this all started I seem to remember some commentators being worried about deflation. It seems that the BoE has pretty well ensured that didn't happen (bastards!) and has now made sure that the poor are now poorer and the rich are still rich.
    The truth is that they are REALLY worried about deflation... of house prices!

    Leave a comment:


  • lilelvis2000
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    Job of BoE is to ensure inflation stays within given parameters - also, to a degree they were limited to, ensure stability of the banking system.
    When this all started I seem to remember some commentators being worried about deflation. It seems that the BoE has pretty well ensured that didn't happen (bastards!) and has now made sure that the poor are now poorer and the rich are still rich.

    Leave a comment:


  • Not So Wise
    replied
    Inflation will not stop until the "quantitative easing" (read: Printing money like there is no tomorrow) stops. Longer it goes on worse the inflation will get. When it stops and when/if pound recovers inflation will slow down, not before

    Originally posted by ChimpMaster View Post
    Sky put their subscription up by a pound today. And for what? The same ol' rubbish that they churn out day in day out. I've already cut the movies and sports and might be tempted to cut further, if only to make a point to them that I hate over-paying for this junk.

    Yes I'd like to keep the Sports channel but it's a matter of principal now. And it gives me a good reason to get out of the house to watch the footie in the pub.

    Inflation up everywhere, except in our rates & salaries.
    Dropped sky a few months ago, basically if you have no interest in the sports it's a waste of money. Had a call from one of their reps yesterday to try to find out why i left and if they could tempt me back.

    He did not get the reference to "57 channels and nothing on" but even he agreed way too much advertising (roughly 25% of all transmissions), don't think he liked my counter to his suggestion of just watching stuff recorded on sky+ "why would i pay you to watch recorded stuff when i can not only download it in HD without ad's for free but also months ahead of you because i get direct from the states?"
    He promptly terminated the call

    Leave a comment:


  • shaunbhoy
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    I was going to say "You sound like you speak having experience of both providers". Then I remembered it was you that I was conversing with.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by shaunbhoy View Post
    ditching them for BT Vision.

    Leave a comment:


  • shaunbhoy
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    Ah, you are obviously not a Sky subscriber then ....

    Not any more............but I did take advantage of their weasely ways for quite a lengthy period before ditching them for BT Vision. Who, incidentally, are little better when it comes to being a rip-off.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by shaunbhoy View Post
    Not in that instance. Just hearsay............obviously!!

    Ah, you are obviously not a Sky subscriber then ....

    Leave a comment:


  • shaunbhoy
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    Do you speak from experience?
    Not in that instance. Just hearsay............obviously!!

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by shaunbhoy View Post
    They are harder to get rid of then Herpes!!!
    Do you speak from experience?

    Leave a comment:


  • shaunbhoy
    replied
    Originally posted by ChimpMaster View Post
    Sky put their subscription up by a pound today. And for what? The same ol' rubbish that they churn out day in day out. I've already cut the movies and sports and might be tempted to cut further, if only to make a point to them that I hate over-paying for this junk.

    Yes I'd like to keep the Sports channel but it's a matter of principal now. And it gives me a good reason to get out of the house to watch the footie in the pub.

    Inflation up everywhere, except in our rates & salaries.
    Tell them you want to get rid of it as you need to economise. They will offer you the same package for half the money for 6 months. At that point go back to them and, if they don't drop it again, they will at least leave you on the half-price package for another 6 months. Easy-peasy!!
    They are harder to get rid of then Herpes!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • markinbrussels
    replied
    Originally posted by ChimpMaster View Post
    Sky put their subscription up by a pound today. And for what? The same ol' rubbish that they churn out day in day out. I've already cut the movies and sports and might be tempted to cut further, if only to make a point to them that I hate over-paying for this junk.
    Have you watched Taliban TV? It's somewhere on the 800s, I think,

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X