• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Another reason pensions suck"

Collapse

  • AlfredJPruffock
    replied
    Originally posted by Shimano105 View Post
    Not me, death is for losers innit?

    Plan B could be to chop the wife's fingers off though.

    Also - one could simply regenerate.

    Leave a comment:


  • Shimano105
    replied
    Not me, death is for losers innit?

    Plan B could be to chop the wife's fingers off though.

    Leave a comment:


  • AlfredJPruffock
    replied
    losing the lot if I peg it (not that I'll care much when that happens)

    Should that be When rather than If you peg it ?

    Over the years Ive been very scathing abour pensions and events have proven my view was correct - it is a scam.

    Leave a comment:


  • Shimano105
    replied
    Pension investment funds suck a monkey's nob.

    But the pension wrapper is quite attractive. I am considering utilising one in some form of SIPP for one reason - it prevents the wife from spending it.

    The real downsides to this are:

    - losing the lot if I peg it (not that I'll care much when that happens)
    - future legislative changes - pension pots are all too tempting for skint governments.

    Leave a comment:


  • Doggy Styles
    replied
    Originally posted by Spacecadet View Post
    The article seems to have it's 50% more and 50% less confused
    Yes, pension holders lose 50% but then have to find 100% to make it up. That's inflation, it would never have happened under Labour.

    Leave a comment:


  • Spacecadet
    replied
    The article seems to have it's 50% more and 50% less confused

    Leave a comment:


  • Doggy Styles
    replied
    Originally posted by Fred Bloggs View Post
    All the more reason to use HL or Alliance Trust savings then. Simples really.
    Really? What are they then?

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    That's the mystery of how they can afford those big plush offices and directors bonuses solved then.

    Leave a comment:


  • Fred Bloggs
    replied
    All the more reason to use HL or Alliance Trust savings then. Simples really.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Factor in real inflation, the fact that you might not live till pension in the first place due to age of retirement changes, and the fact that in any case there won't be enough money in this ponzi scheme to pay off you in 40 years, so there is a guarantee that your pot will be raided in the interests of fairness.

    It's no wonder people buy houses expecting them to be their pension.

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    started a topic Another reason pensions suck

    Another reason pensions suck

    Charges and fees cutting 50 per cent from British savers' pension pots - Telegraph

    Charges:

    A 25-year-old worker putting £200 a month into the HSBC World Selection Personal Pension for 40 years and receiving typical returns would be charged a total of £248,650, according to industry figures.

    The worker would be left with only £248,453, according to the Financial Services Authority, meaning that just over half the pension pot would be absorbed by costs.


    Legal and General’s Portfolio Pension would cost £209,000 in charges and deductions, while Scottish Widows’ Individual Personal Pension Plan would cost £160,000 of the £497,103 accumulated with a typically expected 7 per cent return.


    Ripoff.
Working...
X