Originally posted by centurian
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Schumacher
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Schumacher"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Zippy View PostOK, ok, I know that post had spelling mistakes.
Strange how the brain works sometimes
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Peoplesoft bloke View PostStill a cheating git. No longer a world-beating driver too though.
I really dont know how he has managed to get away with running Hill, Villenueve, Barachello and others off the track, attempting to run them off the track or parking his car on the final corner at Monaco to prevent someone else (driver's name escapes me) getting pole instead of him.
He's only ever got a slap on the wrist.
Nothing will change until the cheat kills someone.
Leave a comment:
-
Actually now I come to think about it - was Schui pissed off because Ruebens beat him in the Star in a Reasonably Priced Car? Oh hang on - Schui was in a Ferrari wasn't he?
Leave a comment:
-
Michael Schumacher has said he is ‘sorry’ for strafing machine gun fire across the drivers’ press conference at the Hungarian Grand Prix.
‘On reflection my actions were too hard,’ said Schumacher on his website. ‘By spraying the entire room with countless rounds of intense gun fire I didn’t want to endanger anyone. If any of the other drivers had this feeling then I am sorry, it was not my intention to cause them to leap out of windows in a blind, terrified panic.’
The seven-time world champion initially denied that he had done anything wrong by hosing down a room of over 30 people using a series of rapidly discharging hand held weapons.
‘Immediately after the race I was still in the heat of it all,’ Schumacher’s statement continued. ‘But after I looked at the amount of furniture that had been cleaved clean in two by my intense bursts of hot lead, I have to say the authorities were correct to intervene.’
After analysing the way in which Schumacher inexplicably hammered at a crowded space with relentless machine gun fire, F1 stewards have decided to penalise the German driver by insisting that he leaves all belt fed weaponary at home for the next grand prix.
Leave a comment:
-
Yeah but Vettle fooked up with that slowing the pack down stunt
Only the lead car can control the pace of the pack - any decent driver should know that so either basic error or he was trying to keep within the mandatory 10 car lenghts of the car in front during a safety car situation and failed - which is another basic error.
No comment on schuey - could have been nasty was not but he needs to sort his head out.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Zippy View PostOK, ok, I know that post had spelling mistakes.
Drive me nto a concrete wall, why don't you
To be serious for a mo - Schu, Vettel and (I think) Alonso should have had a ban for similar offences.
Did you see the look on Vettel's face on the podium at the weekend?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Doggy Styles View PostIsn't it ruthlessness, rather than arrogance?
That's not to say he isn't arrogant, but I'd have said what he did was ruthless.
Leave a comment:
-
Isn't it ruthlessness, rather than arrogance?
That's not to say he isn't arrogant, but I'd have said what he did was ruthless.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by d000hg View PostReally, got a link - I never thought we'd see the day!
Schumacher wrote on his website: "The manoeuvre against him was too hard.
"I didn't want to endanger him with my manoeuvre. If he had this feeling I am sorry, this was not my intention.""Immediately after the race yesterday I was still in the heat of it all, but after I looked again at the situation with Rubens I have to say that the stewards were correct with their judgement,"
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by d000hg View PostHis comment afterwards "Rubens should have gone the other side" was ridiculous though.
Leave a comment:
-
Vettel's (if we're talking about the German GP) was nowhere near the same. He made a move to try and stop the other guy getting through, and as soon as it was clear that was no good, he made space. Trying to scare the other guy of is one thing, but Schumacher gave no indication he would move and if the wall had been 6 feet longer, there would have been a collision. You also saw him watching in his mirror waiting for Rubens to get inside him before he tried to squash him. I will consider that he is good enough he could see Rubens had the 5cm to spare between his car and the wall, but it seems a bit unlikely. His comment afterwards "Rubens should have gone the other side" was ridiculous though.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Secondary NI threshold sinking to £5,000: a limited company director’s explainer Dec 24 09:51
- Reeves sets Spring Statement 2025 for March 26th Dec 23 09:18
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
- Accounting for Contractors Dec 19 15:30
- Chartered Accountants with MarchMutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants with March Mutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants Dec 19 15:05
- Unfairly barred from contracting? Petrofac just paid the price Dec 19 09:43
- An IR35 case law look back: contractor must-knows for 2025-26 Dec 18 09:30
- A contractor’s Autumn Budget financial review Dec 17 10:59
Leave a comment: