Reply to: Mostly Harmless

[sasguru]

The remarkably witty "Better than AtW" epithet.

A bit like being "Less skint than Somalia".

Still, if it meets your personal expectations, who are WE to poke fun at it eh?

Oh that! That was made up for me by admin as I couldn't be bothered to choose one myself.

hth

[shaunbhoy]

What custom title?

The remarkably witty "Better than AtW" epithet.

A bit like being "Less skint than Somalia".

Still, if it meets your personal expectations, who are WE to poke fun at it eh?

[sasguru]

So, how's that custom title working out for you? Making you feel good?

What custom title?

[MarillionFan]

The problem with the system is that any normal, psychologically healthy posters don't give a tulip - so the system is used by the bedwetter clique to boost each other's fragile egos and neg those they don't like.
Sad really.

You gotta work from the inside man. The inside.

I mean the system is foolproof right? You'd never get a look at me, trolling poster for example ahead of someone reputable like a Nick Fitz poster would you! Would you?

[NickFitz]

The problem with the system is that any normal, psychologically healthy posters don't give a tulip - so the system is used by the bedwetter clique to boost each other's fragile egos and neg those they don't like.
Sad really.

So, how's that custom title working out for you? Making you feel good?

[TimberWolf]

I can't rep people I repped before, yet, and the novelty is wearing thin now.

[Moscow Mule]

That or

a) Post something funny
b) Post something interesting
c) Post something financial
d) Post something that people are interested in.

Mmm. Thats you ****ed I'd say.

Says you with the army of socks, I can't see any other reason for people repping you.

[TimberWolf]

Just make some posts with pics of Kylie with not much on, seems to get some +ve rep. But I'm still mostly harmless.

[sasguru]

The problem with the system is that any normal, psychologically healthy posters don't give a tulip - so the system is used by the bedwetter clique to boost each other's fragile egos and neg those they don't like.
Sad really.

[Zippy]

So what do you have to do to change the rating? At the moment I sound like a dose of swine flu.

Have you tried brown-nosing posters with a higher rep?

[Drewster]

That or

a) Post something funny
b) Post something interesting
c) Post something financial
d) Post something that people are interested in.

Mmm. Thats you ****ed I'd say.

If any one of a-d are true - HTF did you get to "Should be listened to"?????

[doodab]

That or a prison shower room and you have to work out how to get the soap!

Create a sockie and ask them to pick it up. Simples.

[MarillionFan]

Once you get to 1000 general is revealed as a darkened room with some keys on the floor.

That or a prison shower room and you have to work out how to get the soap!

[doodab]

-xxxxx to <0 - Slower than a 486
0 - 10 - Neither Here nor There
11 - 49 Mostly Harmless
50 - 99 Makes Sense
100 - xxxx Should be listened to

Thats what we know so far.

Once you get to 1000 general is revealed as a darkened room with some keys on the floor.

[NickFitz]

I struggle to find where the ratings I've got are - I could see two, one red, one green but no comments. And without knowing the scale I can't even be sure if I'm the default or one below/above.

edit: just took me 5min to even find any hint of reputation. For no reason at all, it's in my 'settings' page. It's not a setting, why ain't it in notifications or profile? And am I supposed to be able to find a history of reputation I've given?

Nobody but admin knows what the full extent of the scale is and what the other descriptions are.

Yep, the ratings are in a pretty stupid place: I don't know why they did it that way. I'll see about shifting it somewhere more sensible, like the profile page. I'm not aware of any way of seeing your rating-giving history, though it sounds like a reasonable feature: I'll have to see if it's feasible.