Been there, done that.
after 3 months got sent to client site as a C++ developer on Borland, I was C++ on Unix. Spoke to HR, "it's the same thing in't"
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: A new type of bench
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "A new type of bench"
Collapse
-
I did a stint at Logica many moons ago. What a joy.
They also had the concept of the 'bench' for internal consultants. Basically once on the bench you were expected to self train yourself. There was an internal job board and you could apply for roles. As always in life those who were good got chosen fast, those weren't had to keep applying.
As Logica was a company that built itself on acquisition this meant that there was a lot of dead weight around(ie. once you acquired someone new you agreed not to make someone redundant for the first year).
If after a number of months(2 I believe) you had still not been placed internally then you went on to a new list. This was a compulsary list that meant you were going to be allocated.
My project got 2 of them!! It's like a legacy in the US collegiate system, you have to take them.
There are some really ******* useless people in the world and some of them are FT consultants!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by shaunbhoy View PostWhy does she not simply apply for a managerial position within the UK's Public Sector? To all intents and purposes, most of them seem to get paid a good salary for achieving the square root of fook all!
So, fare thee well diversity officers. The gravy train terminates at Great Whinging.
Leave a comment:
-
Why does she not simply apply for a managerial position within the UK's Public Sector? To all intents and purposes, most of them seem to get paid a good salary for achieving the square root of fook all!
Leave a comment:
-
A new type of bench
Anyone here had this kind of situation?
When Sally graduated from college, she had aspirations of finding a career in project management. And much to her delight, she landed a great position with a large, internationally-based consulting firm. In addition to billing out fresh college graduates at obscenely high rates, the company developed obscenely expensive software for large enterprises.
With the vast majority of the firm’s software development being performed at the other end of the world, they relied heavily on teams at the client’s site to define application requirements and act as the “face” for the offshore developers. Sally was hired to work on these types of teams and, and to her, it seemed like a perfect fit.
Soon after being brought on, Sally was given a thorough “onshoring” training course at the company’s US headquarters. Basically, it was everything one needed to know to be a highly-paid consultant: proper protocol for communicating between the various groups, the importance of good documentation, and a crash course in project management best practices. Everything was a little bit rushed, but the instructors explained that everything was simply an overview – the real training would be learned on the job.
On the last day of training, Sally expected to receive her first assignment, but instead she returned home without any further direction. Naturally concerned, Sally called the HR representative who had hired her and asked when she might expect to be assigned to a client.
“Oh, that’s because you’ve been temporarily benched,” explained her HR rep, “Don’t worry though, really it should only be a week, tops!” The rep further explained that while on the bench, she would receive a full salary with benefits, and to think of it as a “paid vacation, minus the vacation part.” Sally was told to take advantage of the time to hone her skills and read up on some of the technologies that the company works with.
At first, it was complete bliss: getting paid to sleep in past 10am, getting paid to eat corn flakes, getting paid to watch Jerry Springer, and then getting paid to read “SAP Best Practices” at the local Starbucks. After the week had passed, Sally gave her rep a ring just to make sure that everything was ok and when she might expect her next assignment.
“We’re working on it!” replied the cheery HR rep, “Things are kind of in a holding pattern ...recession, dontchaknow!” she chuckled under her breath.
Sally asked when she might want to touch base again but she received a curt, and almost cliché, “Don’t call us, we’ll call you.”
Skip ahead a year later when Sally’s phone rings - it was the HR department of the company that she had received a steady stream of paychecks for the past 11 months and 22 days.
Turns out that a position at a client site had finally materialized...in Seattle...some thousand miles away.
Starting Monday.
Such a sudden and radical move wasn’t something that Sally had expected, but at this point, any opportunity seemed better than baking an anniversary cake for her time sitting on the bench. So, after some quick negotiations of the wheres and whens, Sally packed her things, boarded a flight, and booked a nice hotel room nearby the client site where she could stay.
It wasn’t too long before Sally realized that something was seriously amiss. As it turned out, some requirement was mistranslated by someone, and the client didn’t actually need an off-shore liaison. No, they needed a mid-level experienced VB developer.
Of course, since both the client and the consulting firm turn around as fast as a battleship, it took two full months for the mess to be sorted out. All the while, Sally did exactly what she had done for the past year: nothing. The only difference was she had to continue living out of a hotel and report to the client’s site every day.
Eventually, Sally was finally told to return home and await a new assignment. The HR rep promised her that they had a new, tentative assignment that was “right around the corner.” To this day, Sally is still waiting for that assignment and, of course, continuing to receive paychecks. But this time, she’s spending her bench time brushing up on her job interviewing skills.Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Is an unpaid umbrella company required to pay contractors? Yesterday 09:28
- The truth of umbrella company regulation is being misconstrued Nov 25 09:23
- Labour’s plan to regulate umbrella companies: a closer look Nov 21 09:24
- When HMRC misses an FTT deadline but still wins another CJRS case Nov 20 09:20
- How 15% employer NICs will sting the umbrella company market Nov 19 09:16
- Contracting Awards 2024 hails 19 firms as best of the best Nov 18 09:13
- How to answer at interview, ‘What’s your greatest weakness?’ Nov 14 09:59
- Business Asset Disposal Relief changes in April 2025: Q&A Nov 13 09:37
- How debt transfer rules will hit umbrella companies in 2026 Nov 12 09:28
- IT contractor demand floundering despite Autumn Budget 2024 Nov 11 09:30
Leave a comment: