- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: back to the dark ages
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "back to the dark ages"
Collapse
-
I take it that for the English exams down South there was some kind of interpretation element where points were awarded. I think I am starting to understand why Churchill was not given a place at university.
I thought I would set a little test for him, what you have to do Churchill is read the following passage and then answer the question which is multiple choice...
FOXES are being blamed for digging up ancient bones at a city cemetery.
Residents living near Rosebank Cemetery, in Pilrig, discovered the gruesome damage while walking there at the weekend.
The city council said it was aware of the damage, and that its pest control team was monitoring the situation. However it is illegal to kill foxes by poisoning or snares
A. The Were-Rabbit
B. Professor Rabbit, Dean of Archaeology at Edinburgh University
C. Foxes
In your own time Churchill...
A, B or C?Last edited by minestrone; 9 June 2010, 21:26.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by MaryPoppins View PostHi, Drewster. You don't half ramble, you.
Originally posted by sasguru View PostIndeed no one could accuse Drewster of having a mind like a steel trap.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Platypus View PostThe latest evidence seems to say that a fox WAS responsible for mauling those children:
BBC News - Fox caught on camera after attack on twins in London
Perhaps that explains the confusion Churchy and Minestrone are having.
Killer corpse-and-baby chewing rabbits have have obviously been disguising themselves as foxes, the cunning sods.Last edited by sasguru; 9 June 2010, 19:35.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by sasguru View PostSo let's summarize:
Churchy believes that a fox did not maul those children in East london because he doesn't believe foxes do that sort of thing...
BBC News - Fox caught on camera after attack on twins in London
Police later saw a fox at the family's home and took a picture of it.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by sasguru View PostSo let's summarize:
Churchy believes that a fox did not maul those children in East london because he doesn't believe foxes do that sort of thing, a notion refuted by Minestrone who has seen foxes chewing on corpses in a cemetery which Churchy believes are more likely to be rabbits because only rabbits would go for the 150 year old corpses in said cemetery while Minestrone asserts that foxes are just as likely to want 150 yearold corpses as 50 year old ones.
Have I got that right?
Leave a comment:
-
Yup, churchill even is boring me now.
Can't be arsed any more.
When I think of churchill I will always think of this...
Leave a comment:
-
It was worth the popcorn yesterday when we were regaled with tales of wererabbits and killer fish... but now it's lost it's mojo.
Leave a comment:
-
So let's summarize:
Churchy believes that a fox did not maul those children in East london because he doesn't believe foxes do that sort of thing, a notion refuted by Minestrone who has seen foxes chewing on corpses in a cemetery which Churchy believes are more likely to be rabbits because only rabbits would go for the 150 year old corpses in said cemetery while Minestrone asserts that foxes are just as likely to want 150 yearold corpses as 50 year old ones.
Have I got that right?
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Reports of umbrella companies’ death are greatly exaggerated Nov 28 10:11
- A new hiring fraud hinges on a limited company, a passport and ‘Ade’ Nov 27 09:21
- Is an unpaid umbrella company required to pay contractors? Nov 26 09:28
- The truth of umbrella company regulation is being misconstrued Nov 25 09:23
- Labour’s plan to regulate umbrella companies: a closer look Nov 21 09:24
- When HMRC misses an FTT deadline but still wins another CJRS case Nov 20 09:20
- How 15% employer NICs will sting the umbrella company market Nov 19 09:16
- Contracting Awards 2024 hails 19 firms as best of the best Nov 18 09:13
- How to answer at interview, ‘What’s your greatest weakness?’ Nov 14 09:59
- Business Asset Disposal Relief changes in April 2025: Q&A Nov 13 09:37
Leave a comment: