• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Krauts ban speckulants."

Collapse

  • suityou01
    replied
    Originally posted by Gonzo View Post
    Can anyone explain to me why naked short selling is a good thing?

    I watched a US Senate debate on the topic a couple of years ago (I must have been in a hotel somewhere in Europe and the financial channels were the only ones in English), they were very knowledgeable on the topic and all agreed that it was a bad thing and succeeded in convincing me while they were at it.

    I think normal short-selling is OK but if people can sell stuff that does not exist, on a regulated exchange, does it not call all the trading on that exchange into question?


    EDIT. OK, I now realise that when trading stocks and shares there is the delivery of a physical thing but this is not the case with Credit Default Swaps, and I don't think I want to know any more.
    Nearly, you just described a warrant on a futures market. A share is not a physical thing.

    Leave a comment:


  • BlasterBates
    replied
    This isn't really about financial markets. The German government is well aware it won't make a blind bit of difference. They just need to do this so they can come in with some swingeing budget cuts. If they hadn't done this there would be no way they could cut their budget. Just takes the wind out of the sails of the opposition - the "Small man" bailing out the "big banks".

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by Gonzo View Post
    Can anyone explain to me why naked short selling is a good thing?
    It's only good thing for a handful of people who can make lots of money out of pockets of other proper long term investors.

    Leave a comment:


  • Scary
    replied
    Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
    How come Brown didn't take us into the Euro? His legacy is blemished.
    The one good thing he did. (Well, didn't do.)

    What naked short selling is for: http://www.deepcapture.com/wp-conten...f-dendreon.pdf

    Leave a comment:


  • Gonzo
    replied
    Can anyone explain to me why naked short selling is a good thing?

    I watched a US Senate debate on the topic a couple of years ago (I must have been in a hotel somewhere in Europe and the financial channels were the only ones in English), they were very knowledgeable on the topic and all agreed that it was a bad thing and succeeded in convincing me while they were at it.

    I think normal short-selling is OK but if people can sell stuff that does not exist, on a regulated exchange, does it not call all the trading on that exchange into question?


    EDIT. OK, I now realise that when trading stocks and shares there is the delivery of a physical thing but this is not the case with Credit Default Swaps, and I don't think I want to know any more.
    Last edited by Gonzo; 19 May 2010, 04:56.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by shaunbhoy View Post
    Do you want fries with that?
    I am not suprised you say that given your daily occupancy

    Leave a comment:


  • HairyArsedBloke
    replied
    Part of me thinks that this is a crafty way of raising interest rates (to combat inflation) though the eurozone without too many people clocking it. This action is going to mean there is has to be an extra risk premium on German debt and since the rest of the eurozone bonds are priced on top of that yields on them have to rise too.

    Then on the other hand I'm thinking, "Nah, none of 'em are that smart. "

    Leave a comment:


  • shaunbhoy
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post

    Good thing I already placed one big order with favourable fixed exchange rate
    Do you want fries with that?

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by HairyArsedBloke View Post
    I started this one nearly two hours before yours. At the time I was surprised that there wasn't one already.






    Good thing I already placed one big order with favourable fixed exchange rate

    Leave a comment:


  • HairyArsedBloke
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    I started this one nearly two hours before yours. At the time I was surprised that there wasn't one already.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
    How come Brown didn't take us into the Euro? His legacy is blemished.
    The City allegedly did not want that to happen.

    HTH

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    How come Brown didn't take us into the Euro? His legacy is blemished.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mich the Tester
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    No, I prefer this one.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied


    http://forums.contractoruk.com/gener...-shorting.html

    Keep up there at the back ffs!

    Leave a comment:


  • cailin maith
    replied
    Much better thread title - well done HAB

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X