
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Macmillan Cancer Support
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Macmillan Cancer Support"
Collapse
-
Well we did it. Along with 4000 or so other people, over 81 Miles with 2000ft of climbing, in a grand total time of 6 hrs 5 mins and 20 secs. A little below the official pace time but we dodged the Broom Wagon.
Weather was great in the end, cool for most of the morning with the sun coming out later on. Glorious blue skies and sunshine at the top of Schiehallon. There were no major incidents or breakdowns between us, although Son did have to be pushed up the hills from about the 70 mile mark. Yours truly clocked the fastest time down the mountain, although not up it. That went to Phil who came 26th overall in the king of the mountain competition. Top speed on the descent of 45 mph. I knew it paid to be a lardy git
We've raised a total of £1040 so far with donations still to come in. We should have at least another £250 yet to add to the total.
Huge thanks to everyone here who donated, you were all extremely generous and we wouldn't have hit our target without you.
I'm off to have a long hot bath and a snooze!
Leave a comment:
-
Right, thats it, packed and ready to go.
See you all on Monday at some point, assuming I don't do myself an injury in the meantime.
Thanks to all who have donated, you've all been extremely generous!
Leave a comment:
-
Good luck - lost both parents to cancer.
Dad, Xmas day 1975 and I went to my Mum's funeral yesterday.
I will visit and give.
Leave a comment:
-
Just another bump on this thread - Dave only needs a couple more sponsors to get to his target.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by DaveB View PostFrankly at this point I'm more worried about doing it into the teeth of a blizzard than exactly how far it is
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by TimberWolf View PostI was half expecting you to correct my 100km distance figure, which should have been 130km not 100km (81miles * ~8/5).
The reason I got it wrong is that rather than multiplying directly by 5/8, I noticed a quicker way. 8 is 2^3 and 5 is 10/2. Resulting in 2*2*2*2/10 which is quick to do mentally. And the reverse (5/8) = 4 divisions by 2 and a multiply by 10 (shift the decimal point right 1). But I must have done 3 divisions by 2 and have been distracted.
So as I think I'm likely make that mistake again, it's best to keep more in touch with the magnitude of the answer and see that it's 1.6x = 1.5x + 0.1x. Or just halve the number and add to the original to get close to the answer and then add 0.1x of the original number to it, both of which operations are quick to do mentality and with less possibility of error.
Leave a comment:
-
I was half expecting you to correct my 100km distance figure, which should have been 130km not 100km (81miles * ~8/5).
The reason I got it wrong is that rather than multiplying directly by 5/8, I noticed a quicker way. 8 is 2^3 and 5 is 10/2. Resulting in 2*2*2*2/10 which is quick to do mentally. And the reverse (5/8) = 4 divisions by 2 and a multiply by 10 (shift the decimal point right 1). But I must have done 3 divisions by 2 and have been distracted.
So as I think I'm likely make that mistake again, it's best to keep more in touch with the magnitude of the answer and see that it's 1.6x = 1.5x + 0.1x. Or just halve the number and add to the original to get close to the answer and then add 0.1x of the original number to it, both of which operations are quick to do mentality and with less possibility of error.
Leave a comment:
-
14mph sounds like a respectable average speed given the terrain. 100km distance and 2km ascent according to the website. According to my quick calculations, the ascent will use up slightly more energy than the flat.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by OwlHoot View PostCrikey, that's a bit harsh.
Does this vehicle have a large cowcatcher, or do they find a set of prongs like a tractor are more of an incentive for stragglers to keep up?
The recovery vehicle is optional, you can choose to continue and take your chances with the traffic, but you effectivly count as a DNF since they wont coun't you as completeing the course if you do and you won't get any further support from the feeding stations or support vehicles if you have a mechanical.
The average required is 14 mph, which doesnt sound like much but thats an average over 81 miles...
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by DaveB View Post
Just to add to the challenge it's run over closed roads with a minimum average speed. If you go too slowly you get swept up by the recovery vehicle at the back of the field!
Does this vehicle have a large cowcatcher, or do they find a set of prongs like a tractor are more of an incentive for stragglers to keep up?
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Yesterday 05:05
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 23 21:05
- IR35: Mutuality Of Obligations — updated for 2025/26 Sep 23 05:22
- Only proactive IT contractors can survive recruitment firm closures Sep 22 07:32
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Sep 19 07:16
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Sep 18 21:16
- IR35: Substitution — updated for 2025/26 Sep 18 05:45
- Payment request to bust recruitment agency — free template Sep 16 21:04
- Why licensing umbrella companies must be key to 2027’s regulation Sep 16 13:55
- Top 5 Chapter 11 JSL myths contractors should know Sep 15 03:46
Leave a comment: