- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on ""For the time being, we have no Prime Minister.""
Collapse
-
***BREAKING NEWS***
Brown's message to nuclear sub commanders released.
Don't bother trying to launch the nukes. Me and Tony sold them all back in '99 to some middle eastern chap for some magic beans that he said would make our economy grow forever.
Leave a comment:
-
"The Sum of All Fears" springs to mind as a recent (past 10 years) example.Originally posted by Sysman View PostThis idea has been used in more than one spy thriller to get the former USSR and the West to wipe each other out, and let the baddies take over.
It was released shortly after the WTC attacks, so I think they toned down the scenes involving the nuclear blast.
Leave a comment:
-
Since one of the RN's nuclear strike subs should always be at sea, I'd imagine they operate in a similar method to the USN's nuclear strike subs.Originally posted by centurian View PostAccording to this article, it wouldn't make any difference - as the actual weapons are deep under the sea.
Victory at last, now for the hard part: deepest cuts in a generation - Times Online
Presumably Gordon Brown did the same - essentially standing instructions to sub commanders in the event that government is wiped out. Of course, we don't know what GB's instructions were...
I would hazzard a guess that 'launch codes' are really just like an SSL certificiate / hash key, so the sub commander can be assured that an execute order (fire, abort, stand down etc.) is really coming from the PM. I would think that the launch control systems on the sub are entirely independent from these 'launch codes'.
Therefore if government is wiped out - and the 'launch codes' lost with it - the sub commander can open the PM's standing instructions, which presumably states that he should nuke whoever was deemed responsible...
That is they come near the surface at set time intervals (every 4 or 5 hours, I think) and if they dont or cant receive an 'everything is OK' type message, confirm strike target and activation codes, fire their load and bring the end of the world about!
Leave a comment:
-
I think Yank submarine captains have standing orders to launch their nuclear missiles if they stop receiving regular orders not to, specifically if they receive no signal for 48 hours on their TACAMO link.Originally posted by MrMark View Post
Of course the sub commander may not have a clue who bombed Britain, especially if it was a "false-flag" terrorist attack.
Not sure of the details though, and these may change over time.
Leave a comment:
-
This idea has been used in more than one spy thriller to get the former USSR and the West to wipe each other out, and let the baddies take over.Originally posted by MrMark View PostOf course the sub commander may not have a clue who bombed Britain, especially if it was a "false-flag" terrorist attack.
Leave a comment:
-
Can't he use his periscope?Originally posted by MrMark View PostOf course the sub commander may not have a clue who bombed Britain, especially if it was a "false-flag" terrorist attack.
Leave a comment:
-
Of course the sub commander may not have a clue who bombed Britain, especially if it was a "false-flag" terrorist attack.Therefore if government is wiped out - and the 'launch codes' lost with it - the sub commander can open the PM's standing instructions, which presumably states that he should nuke whoever was deemed responsible...
Leave a comment:
-
According to this article, it wouldn't make any difference - as the actual weapons are deep under the sea.Originally posted by AtW View PostSounds like it's ze perfect time for a pre-emptive disarming nuclear strike
Victory at last, now for the hard part: deepest cuts in a generation - Times Online
Presumably Gordon Brown did the same - essentially standing instructions to sub commanders in the event that government is wiped out. Of course, we don't know what GB's instructions were...One of Mr Cameron’s first tasks will be to answer two vital questions about national security.
The first will be the decision — placed in a sealed envelope and handed to the commanders of Britain’s nuclear submarines to be put in a safe — over whether to retaliate in the event of a nuclear strike.
I would hazzard a guess that 'launch codes' are really just like an SSL certificiate / hash key, so the sub commander can be assured that an execute order (fire, abort, stand down etc.) is really coming from the PM. I would think that the launch control systems on the sub are entirely independent from these 'launch codes'.
Therefore if government is wiped out - and the 'launch codes' lost with it - the sub commander can open the PM's standing instructions, which presumably states that he should nuke whoever was deemed responsible...
Leave a comment:
-
Sounds like it's ze perfect time for a pre-emptive disarming nuclear strike
Leave a comment:
-
"For the time being, we have no Prime Minister."
The Times
7.45pm Brown leaves the Palace
Gordon Brown and his family have left Buckingham Palace.
For the time being, we have no Prime Minister.
Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Six things coming to contractors in 2026: a year of change, caution and (maybe) opportunity Jan 7 06:24
- Umbrella companies, beware JSL tunnel vision now that the Employment Rights Act is law Today 06:11
- 26 predictions for UK IT contracting in 2026 Yesterday 07:17
- How salary sacrifice pension changes will hit contractors Dec 24 07:48
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Dec 23 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Dec 22 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22
- How asking a tech jobs agency basic questions got one IT contractor withdrawn Dec 17 07:21
- Are Home Office immigration policies sacrificing IT contractors for ‘cheap labour’? Dec 16 07:48

Leave a comment: