Originally posted by MarillionFan
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Oi Swati!!!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Oi Swati!!!"
Collapse
-
Did you only just notice the swear filter is off Sas you fúcking cretin!
Leave a comment:
-
OMG.. you can tulip?? ROFL.. Thats just bollocks... OMG you can say that as well. Christ, next they will let us say tits....
Leave a comment:
-
Your spelling of ‘tulip’ is even worse.Originally posted by Churchill View PostYour spelling of "tulip" is, well, erm... tulip!
Leave a comment:
-
Your spelling of "tulip" is, well, erm... tulip!Originally posted by northernladuk View PostAs a sockie that is worst bit of fail I have seen so far. Seems this is obviously a sockie and a tulip one at that so it ought to be banned. Just the fact that the owner isn't capable of running an interesting/amusing sockie without giving the game away so blatently is reason enough for a start.
Oh and also because it is utter tulip as well or did I say that aready.
Leave a comment:
-
As a sockie that is worst bit of fail I have seen so far. Seems this is obviously a sockie and a sh1t one at that so it ought to be banned. Just the fact that the owner isn't capable of running an interesting/amusing sockie without giving the game away so blatently is reason enough for a start.I trust you will endeavour to comply with what I am asking so we can riase our forum back to the standrads that we normally expect of it. Thankyou.
Oh and also because it is utter sh!t as well or did I say that aready.
Leave a comment:
-
I don't know about you mate but I think of Jobbying in a Bill Connoly way...Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post'Poosibly', indeed, our doings are most disgraceful when we should be jobbying.
Oh the glorious days of contracting past, when you could have the £10 tulip...
Leave a comment:
-
'Poosibly', indeed, our doings are most disgraceful when we should be jobbying.Originally posted by Swati View PostSir, If you read my contributions to our site I think you will find that this contribution and all the contributions I have been maiking to our site have been about serious issues and I have been endeavouring to be as informative as I can poosibly by way of sharing my knowledge and doings for the greater good of the community of our forum.
If I were to take a picture of what goes on in this site and I showed these pictures or this film to people back home in india they would never believe this was happening in britan in 2010. I trust you will endeavour to comply with what I am asking so we can riase our forum back to the standrads that we normally expect of it. Thankyou.
Leave a comment:
-
Sir, If you read my contributions to our site I think you will find that this contribution and all the contributions I have been maiking to our site have been about serious issues and I have been endeavouring to be as informative as I can poosibly by way of sharing my knowledge and doings for the greater good of the community of our forum.
If I were to take a picture of what goes on in this site and I showed these pictures or this film to people back home in india they would never believe this was happening in britan in 2010. I trust you will endeavour to comply with what I am asking so we can riase our forum back to the standrads that we normally expect of it. Thankyou.
Leave a comment:
-
Isn't Bob mildly amusing and interesting though?Originally posted by Churchill View PostIs Bob your uncle?
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- JSL rules ‘are HMRC’s way to make contractor umbrella company clients give a sh*t where their money goes’ Today 07:42
- Contractors warned over HMRC charging £3.5 billion too much Feb 6 03:18
- Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) for umbrella company contractors: an April 2026 explainer Feb 5 07:19
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Feb 4 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Feb 3 07:47
- Business expenses: What IT contractors can and cannot claim from HMRC Jan 30 08:44
- April’s umbrella PAYE risk: how contractors’ end-clients are prepping Jan 29 05:45
- How EV tax changes of 2025-2028 add up for contractor limited company directors Jan 28 08:11
- Under the terms he was shackled by, Ray McCann’s Loan Charge Review probably is a fair resolution Jan 27 08:41
- Contractors, a £25million crackdown on rogue company directors is coming Jan 26 05:02

Leave a comment: