• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Time to bring back propeller driven planes ..."

Collapse

  • doodab
    replied
    Originally posted by Swati View Post
    not all propeller planes would work in the cloud of volcanic ash, only piston prop planes because these do not suck in air like the turbo prop planes. Turo prop planes work on exactly the same prinliciple as a jet engine except that the force is used to spin propeller instaed of thrust
    Where do they get the air they use to burn the fuel to create the little explosions that move the pistons up and down?

    Leave a comment:


  • RSoles
    replied
    Yay! Bring back Little Nellie!

    Leave a comment:


  • gingerjedi
    replied
    Originally posted by RSoles View Post
    Or this: http://www.cartercopters.com/

    Our primary focus is the slowed-rotor compound aircraft, a vertical takeoff and landing aircraft that uses the rotor for takeoff and landing, and a small, efficient wing for high speed flight, up to 500 mph, all with much less complexity than a tilt-rotor or other vectored thrust vehicle. We successfully demonstrated the slowed rotor concept with the CarterCopter Technology Demonstrator (CCTD), the first and only aircraft to reach mu-1

    Leave a comment:


  • RSoles
    replied
    The future.....

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zeppelin_NT

    Leave a comment:


  • Drewster
    replied
    Originally posted by Churchill View Post
    .....it's a toss between MF and Sasguru....
    Oh FFS!!! Did you have to!!!!
    I'm not going to sleep tonight.... I'll never get that image out of my head!!

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    Originally posted by Swati View Post
    Welcome sir

    Are you making much propellerings for very much cheapings?

    Leave a comment:


  • Swati
    replied
    Originally posted by Churchill View Post
    Thanks for that.

    Welcome sir

    Leave a comment:


  • Churchill
    replied
    Originally posted by Swati View Post
    not all propeller planes would work in the cloud of volcanic ash, only piston prop planes because these do not suck in air like the turbo prop planes. Turo prop planes work on exactly the same prinliciple as a jet engine except that the force is used to spin propeller instaed of thrust
    Thanks for that.

    Leave a comment:


  • Swati
    replied
    not all propeller planes would work in the cloud of volcanic ash, only piston prop planes because these do not suck in air like the turbo prop planes. Turo prop planes work on exactly the same prinliciple as a jet engine except that the force is used to spin propeller instaed of thrust

    Leave a comment:


  • Paddy
    replied
    Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
    Back in my 100metres days I'm sure I gained an unfair advantage from start line flatulence.
    The gas knocked out the other competitors.

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    Anyway getting back to propeller aircraft. You could probably guess at how much filtering you'd need in place from a given concentration of dust in the air. E.g. if air were 1 part in 1000 ash, fuel on board 50 tonnes, fuel to air mixture 20 to 1, that's 20*50,000 Kg air used = 1,000,000 kg air per that flight. Dividing by 1000 = 1000 kg dust in the filters. Those are just made up numbers though. Presumably actual dust concentrations would be less. For a turbo or jet engine the dust figures would be staggering.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mich the Tester
    replied
    Originally posted by Churchill View Post
    Like it.
    Ryanair has cancelled all of its flights until Wednesday, though aviation experts stressed this is probably just an elaborate tax dodge.

    Professor Henry Brubaker, of the Institute for Studies, said: "According to my computer, it would take ages to get to Australia, but, by the same token, it would also take an awfully long time for Australians to get here. Which would, of course, be excellent."

    Leave a comment:


  • Churchill
    replied
    Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
    The mash have it spot on again.
    Originally posted by TheMash
    As the Icelandic volcano attack entered its fifth day...
    Like it.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mich the Tester
    replied
    The mash have it spot on again.

    Leave a comment:


  • Churchill
    replied
    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
    So, who's the densest body on this forum?
    Body Mass - Threaded
    Dense in the head - it's a toss up between MF and Sasguru

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X