Originally posted by sasguru
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: It's Time To Sack The New Mods
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "It's Time To Sack The New Mods"
Collapse
-
Oh and I forgot to add the biggest crime of all for mods: a complete lack of judgement.
-
Please let me know when you add some value, cretinOriginally posted by TykeMerc View PostIt was obvious that AtW and Sasguru would be back (although I have no doubt that those entities were posting under sockies anyway), such dedicated trolls can't be removed short of permanently closing the board. The only thing either of those could do to surprise me would be to add some value.
I'm pleased FaQQer and EO have returned although I'm not convinced that EO post was done by EO as it seems very out of character.
Leave a comment:
-
It was obvious that AtW and Sasguru would be back (although I have no doubt that those entities were posting under sockies anyway), such dedicated trolls can't be removed short of permanently closing the board. The only thing either of those could do to surprise me would be to add some value.Originally posted by Ravello View PostYep and indeed the Russian, but we knew he wouldn't stay away. - Chef hope this is going into your summary...
I'm pleased FaQQer and EO have returned although I'm not convinced that EO post was done by EO as it seems very out of character.
Leave a comment:
-
Maybe it was all a cunning ploy to lure the flouncers back - sas, EO, TF have all put in an appearance....
Leave a comment:
-
If Reality Hack was standing in front of me now, for the crime of wrecking this forum, even inadvertantly
I would ram my fist down his throat, grab his @rse hole and pull him inside fkng out
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Andrew Griffith MP says Tories would reform IR35 Oct 7 00:41
- New umbrella company JSL rules: a 2026 guide for contractors Oct 5 22:50
- Top 5 contractor compliance challenges, as 2025-26 nears Oct 3 08:53
- Joint and Several Liability ‘won’t retire HMRC's naughty list’ Oct 2 05:28
- What contractors can take from the Industria Umbrella Ltd case Sep 30 23:05
- Is ‘Open To Work’ on LinkedIn due an IR35 dropdown menu? Sep 30 05:57
- IR35: Control — updated for 2025-26 Sep 28 21:28
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Sep 25 08:07


EO's back 
Leave a comment: