Originally posted by sasguru
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: It's Time To Sack The New Mods
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "It's Time To Sack The New Mods"
Collapse
-
Oh and I forgot to add the biggest crime of all for mods: a complete lack of judgement.
-
Please let me know when you add some value, cretinOriginally posted by TykeMerc View PostIt was obvious that AtW and Sasguru would be back (although I have no doubt that those entities were posting under sockies anyway), such dedicated trolls can't be removed short of permanently closing the board. The only thing either of those could do to surprise me would be to add some value.
I'm pleased FaQQer and EO have returned although I'm not convinced that EO post was done by EO as it seems very out of character.
Leave a comment:
-
It was obvious that AtW and Sasguru would be back (although I have no doubt that those entities were posting under sockies anyway), such dedicated trolls can't be removed short of permanently closing the board. The only thing either of those could do to surprise me would be to add some value.Originally posted by Ravello View PostYep and indeed the Russian, but we knew he wouldn't stay away. - Chef hope this is going into your summary...
I'm pleased FaQQer and EO have returned although I'm not convinced that EO post was done by EO as it seems very out of character.
Leave a comment:
-
Maybe it was all a cunning ploy to lure the flouncers back - sas, EO, TF have all put in an appearance....
Leave a comment:
-
If Reality Hack was standing in front of me now, for the crime of wrecking this forum, even inadvertantly
I would ram my fist down his throat, grab his @rse hole and pull him inside fkng out
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- What does the non-compete clause consultation mean for contractors? Today 07:59
- To escalate or wait? With late payment, even month two is too late Yesterday 07:26
- Signs of IT contractor jobs uplift softened in January 2026 Feb 17 07:37
- ‘Make Work Pay…’ heralds a new era for umbrella company compliance Feb 16 08:23
- Should a new limited company not making much money pay a salary/dividend? Feb 13 08:43
- Blocking the 2025 Loan Charge settlement opportunity from being a genuine opportunity is… HMRC Feb 12 07:41
- How a buyer’s market in UK property for 2026 is contractors’ double-edge sword Feb 11 07:12
- Why PAYE overcharging by HMRC is every contractor’s problem Feb 10 06:26
- Government unveils ‘Umbrella Company Regulations consultation’ Feb 9 05:55
- JSL rules ‘are HMRC’s way to make contractor umbrella company clients give a sh*t where their money goes’ Feb 8 07:42


EO's back 
Leave a comment: