• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Tories to cut IT to keep National Insurance down"

Collapse

  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by Sysman View Post
    They haven't been in office yet.

    And EDS are probably morel worried about their own jobs

    Brilliant the Summer of discontent - now it's bound to be a hot summer.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sysman
    replied
    Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
    Does this mean the Tories haven't been "lobbied" buy EDS et. al., and don't have cushy directorships lined up for them when they leave office?
    They haven't been in office yet.

    And EDS are probably morel worried about their own jobs

    Leave a comment:


  • swamp
    replied
    Originally posted by ratewhore View Post
    Sorry. I had work to do today and I could only skim read the titles.

    "me me me or the bigger picture?" didn't jump out at me as being anything to do with anything.

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    Does this mean the Tories haven't been "lobbied" buy EDS et. al., and don't have cushy directorships lined up for them when they leave office?

    Leave a comment:


  • HairyArsedBloke
    replied
    Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
    This will cause more problems for the Indian economy than it will ours.
    Really, I'd say the opposite. What little is still done here will be lost to India as suppliers are put under more pressure to drive down costs.

    Leave a comment:


  • DodgyAgent
    replied
    This will cause more problems for the Indian economy than it will ours.

    Leave a comment:


  • Churchill
    replied
    Originally posted by threaded View Post
    They could come to my company, get the product and still achieve those cuts. The increased efficiency would mean they could make bigger savings year on year afterwards too.

    But they won't, 'cause TPTB don't really want any of it to work: can't score political points in the UK on a system that works and doesn't need tinkering with.

    Nurse!!! Threaded needs his medication!

    Leave a comment:


  • ratewhore
    replied
    Originally posted by The Wikir Man View Post
    Need a moderator to merge the two threads - where's NAT when you need her?
    Too busy handing out infringements, or whatever they're calling a stern telling off these days...

    Leave a comment:


  • BolshieBastard
    replied
    Originally posted by swamp View Post
    The shadow chancellor today announced cuts in large IT programmes would form part of a £6bn public spending squeeze under a Tory government, that would be used to cancel most of a rise in national insurance planned for next year by Labour.

    Under the plan to slash "without reducing the quality of front line services", George Osborne announced:

    * New IT projects would be shelved
    * Ongoing project would be cancelled if they were not delivering value
    * Supplier contracts would be renegotiated
    * Discretionary spending on IT services would be cut

    But he was unable to cite specific projects, as opposition parties are not allowed to inspect government contracts.

    Despite this, the Conservatives have already pledged to scrap ID Cards and the National Identity Register, as well as ContactPoint, the national database of children's details, which is up and running.

    They have also promised to review the forthcoming Interception Modernisation Programme, which the Home Office has estimated at £2bn over ten years. The security establishment would be very resistant to any cut to the project, however.

    Meanwhile cuts to the £12bn National Programme for IT, one of the world's largest public IT projects, would not return to the Treasury, as the Tories plan to ringfence the NHS budget.

    The government immediately critised the announcement as lacking substance.

    "George Osborne's savings are so flaky, he's admitted he doesn't even know which department is going to pay what," the Times reports a spokeswoman for Alistair Darling said.

    Osbornes's plan is based on recommendations from Sir Peter Gershon and Dr Martin Read. Gershon is a former head of the Office of Government Commerce, and Read the former chief executive of LogicaCMG.®

    http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/03/29/osborne_it/
    National saviours, arent they? Not!

    Leave a comment:


  • The Wikir Man
    replied
    Originally posted by ratewhore View Post
    Need a moderator to merge the two threads - where's NAT when you need her?

    Leave a comment:


  • ratewhore
    replied
    KUATB

    Leave a comment:


  • BlasterBates
    replied
    hip hip hurray......

    oh er ...hang on

    Leave a comment:


  • threaded
    replied
    They could come to my company, get the product and still achieve those cuts. The increased efficiency would mean they could make bigger savings year on year afterwards too.

    But they won't, 'cause TPTB don't really want any of it to work: can't score political points in the UK on a system that works and doesn't need tinkering with.

    Leave a comment:


  • swamp
    started a topic Tories to cut IT to keep National Insurance down

    Tories to cut IT to keep National Insurance down

    The shadow chancellor today announced cuts in large IT programmes would form part of a £6bn public spending squeeze under a Tory government, that would be used to cancel most of a rise in national insurance planned for next year by Labour.

    Under the plan to slash "without reducing the quality of front line services", George Osborne announced:

    * New IT projects would be shelved
    * Ongoing project would be cancelled if they were not delivering value
    * Supplier contracts would be renegotiated
    * Discretionary spending on IT services would be cut

    But he was unable to cite specific projects, as opposition parties are not allowed to inspect government contracts.

    Despite this, the Conservatives have already pledged to scrap ID Cards and the National Identity Register, as well as ContactPoint, the national database of children's details, which is up and running.

    They have also promised to review the forthcoming Interception Modernisation Programme, which the Home Office has estimated at £2bn over ten years. The security establishment would be very resistant to any cut to the project, however.

    Meanwhile cuts to the £12bn National Programme for IT, one of the world's largest public IT projects, would not return to the Treasury, as the Tories plan to ringfence the NHS budget.

    The government immediately critised the announcement as lacking substance.

    "George Osborne's savings are so flaky, he's admitted he doesn't even know which department is going to pay what," the Times reports a spokeswoman for Alistair Darling said.

    Osbornes's plan is based on recommendations from Sir Peter Gershon and Dr Martin Read. Gershon is a former head of the Office of Government Commerce, and Read the former chief executive of LogicaCMG.®

    http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/03/29/osborne_it/

Working...
X