Originally posted by TiroFijo
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Why people are skeptical about Global Warming"
Collapse
-
Indeed.Originally posted by TheBigYinJames View PostWe've had the technical ability to remote work for over 20 years. I was working at BT during the time they were trying to sell the concept of remote working to their customers whilst not enabling it for their own staff.
15 or 16 years ago I worked for BT Managed Network Services in Apsley, Hertfordshire; the other half of BT MNS worked at Euston. All day, every day, people shuttled back and forth up that railway line to attend meetings at the other site because we were not allowed to use the bleeding-edge teleconferencing suites installed at each office. Instead they were used only once per month by senior management and were kept locked the rest of the time.
Leave a comment:
-
We've had the technical ability to remote work for over 20 years. I was working at BT during the time they were trying to sell the concept of remote working to their customers whilst not enabling it for their own staff. Until companies get taxed for forcing bums on seats when it's not neccessary, they'll still force us to come in.Originally posted by larson View PostInfrastructure has been built around the car. Hopefully remote working, with better voice and video implementations will mean more branch offices with smaller presence. Large cities are significantly more costly to operate when compared to small towns.
Leave a comment:
-
-
Isn't it better to call it "severely accelerated climate change," rather than just "global warming"?
I think human development has accelerated the change in climate, going forwards - in normal change evolutionary aspects allow species to adapt. Accelerated change thwarts the adaption process, which is one of the major issues.
Infrastructure has been built around the car. Hopefully remote working, with better voice and video implementations will mean more branch offices with smaller presence. Large cities are significantly more costly to operate when compared to small towns.
Leave a comment:
-
I understand that this global warming thing is supposed to be happening at a very fast rate, I'm guessing here, but this is quite possibly much faster than the procreation rates of humans could be increased by natural selection to fill the gap.Originally posted by TimberWolf View PostTrouble is, people who don't breed get removed from the gene pool, leaving more breeders.

(Although I've met more than one project manager that thinks 9 women can make a baby in one month, so I might be missing something.)
Leave a comment:
-
Trouble is, people who don't breed get removed from the gene pool, leaving more breeders.Originally posted by threaded View PostI have the simplest most obvious cure to this problem, and my cure is guaranteed to work, yet no environ-politicians I've seen, or heard, actually talks about it in anything like the terms they use for SUVs, burning coal etc.
The cure is straight forward and extremely easy to implement: it is for all these environmentalists/politicians to not breed. Possibly even top themselves.
My plan will save so much more carbon footprint than making some of the more expensive cars more expensive to people who already have so much money that they don't really notice.
Now it is obvious even to the
gurus of the world that my cure would work, is extremely easy to implement, and costs nothing, and because all I see is these fake environmentalists talking about raising taxes, I know they don't really care about the environment at all, but are all about the politics of envy.
HTH

Leave a comment:
-
I have the simplest most obvious cure to this problem, and my cure is guaranteed to work, yet no environ-politicians I've seen, or heard, actually talks about it in anything like the terms they use for SUVs, burning coal etc.Originally posted by TimberWolf View PostGlobal warming is a side issue, a symptom of a greater disease. The problem is population and the increase in standards of living picking up pace worldwide. Mix exponential growth with finite resources and you have an unavoidable and spectacular end. And everything looks fine until just before things goes bang. At some stage, probably not far off, zero or negative growth is a mathematical certainty if we don't have a spectacular collapse before hand.
The cure is straight forward and extremely easy to implement: it is for all these environmentalists/politicians to not breed. Possibly even top themselves.
My plan will save so much more carbon footprint than making some of the more expensive cars more expensive to people who already have so much money that they don't really notice.
Now it is obvious even to the
gurus of the world that my cure would work, is extremely easy to implement, and costs nothing, and because all I see is these fake environmentalists talking about raising taxes, I know they don't really care about the environment at all, but are all about the politics of envy.
HTH
Leave a comment:
-
The problem for me is, I agree with more recycling, cutting energy and fuel use, etc etc. These are all worthy goals worth pursuing on their own. I don't need to be scared by threats of the burny fire.Originally posted by EternalOptimist View PostScare tactics get my back up also.

Leave a comment:
-
Scare tactics get my back up also.
The other line, taken by a couple here is, 'Even if we are wrong, we will end up doing the right thing, for the wrong reasons'
Leave a comment:
-
For me, that's true. Also the false logic of "if we're right and we could have done something about it.. therefore we must" scare tactic argument.Originally posted by NotAllThere View PostI think most skepticism arise from the politicalisation of the issues.
Leave a comment:
-
nice quote from Bill Clinton
http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2010/0...and-the-press/Elsewhere in his remarks, he noted he was speaking on the night before the start of spring, “otherwise known to Al Gore as proof of global warming.”
kind of sums up the Global warming argument really.
Leave a comment:
-
It's all down to cows producing methane. I don't care if this contributes to global warming as I like my meat too much. End of discussion.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- ‘Make Work Pay…’ heralds a new era for umbrella company compliance Feb 16 08:23
- Should a new limited company not making much money pay a salary/dividend? Feb 13 08:43
- Blocking the 2025 Loan Charge settlement opportunity from being a genuine opportunity is… HMRC Feb 12 07:41
- How a buyer’s market in UK property for 2026 is contractors’ double-edge sword Feb 11 07:12
- Why PAYE overcharging by HMRC is every contractor’s problem Feb 10 06:26
- Government unveils ‘Umbrella Company Regulations consultation’ Feb 9 05:55
- JSL rules ‘are HMRC’s way to make contractor umbrella company clients give a sh*t where their money goes’ Feb 8 07:42
- Contractors warned over HMRC charging £3.5 billion too much Feb 6 03:18
- Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) for umbrella company contractors: an April 2026 explainer Feb 5 07:19
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Feb 4 07:11

Leave a comment: