Reply to: more anti british discrimination

[NotAllThere]

talk about having your head in the sand

Not quite the attitude a mod should display.

Sheesh. Sense of humour failure or what? Lighten up. It wasn't an entirely serious suggestion, more a variant on hyperbole. (But please don't joke about taking my skis away )

Don't you think that the "It's the Daily Mail <snigger>" thing is rather tired now? Not to mention a somewhat poor attempt at demonstrating intellectual superiority?

No. It's a hack rag. Daily Mail - read by the wives of those who run the country.

Wrt to it being racist, of course it isn't. However, it is a tactic of racists to stir up race issues.

[Incognito]

Mr D is a racist bigot who takes this approach, on multiple forums no doubt, to try to stir things up rather than engage in meaningful debate.

HTH.

What was racist and bigoted about his post in this thread? Just interested how you see it.

[Clippy]

The article has already been discussed elsewhere on CUK today.

Just posting a link to an article on the Daily Mail website does not contribute a great deal to the forum - at least say something about it rather than just saying "here is an article".

Mr D is a racist bigot who takes this approach, on multiple forums no doubt, to try to stir things up rather than engage in meaningful debate.

HTH.

[shaunbhoy]

I agree that by most CUK standards that constitutes debate, but having a subject and a link doesn't rate too highly in my book.

Particularly when there is ALREADY A DEBATE ON THE SAME ARTICLE ALREADY GOING ON!

Yes, always worth bearing in mind that this was posted by mrdonuts. To say he is a bit slow is putting it mildly. Intellectually speaking, he gets lapped by tortoises. I mean it has been getting discussed for hours already FFS!


Oi donut.............KUATB

[The Wikir Man]

The OP (mrdonuts) said "more anti british discrimination".

I agree that by most CUK standards that constitutes debate, but having a subject and a link doesn't rate too highly in my book.

Particularly when there is ALREADY A DEBATE ON THE SAME ARTICLE ALREADY GOING ON!

[RichardCranium]

Just posting a link to an article on the Daily Mail website does not contribute a great deal to the forum - at least say something about it rather than just saying "here is an article".

The OP (mrdonuts) said "more anti british discrimination".

[The Wikir Man]

The article has already been discussed elsewhere on CUK today.

Just posting a link to an article on the Daily Mail website does not contribute a great deal to the forum - at least say something about it rather than just saying "here is an article".

[Platypus]

I'm still in favour of anyone who links to the daily wail receiving an automatic ban.

Don't you think that the "It's the Daily Mail <snigger>" thing is rather tired now?

Not to mention a somewhat poor attempt at demonstrating intellectual superiority?

[Zippy]

I'm still in favour of anyone who links to the daily wail receiving an automatic ban.

Nonsense! Hang 'em, flog 'em and send 'em all back.

(or is that the Express?)

[blacjac]

talk about having your head in the sand

Not quite the attitude a mod should display.

Sack him!! No - take his skis away...

WHS

Come off it, stop stirring.

[The Wikir Man]

Hasn't this "story" been discussed in two other threads today?

Edit: Yes it has.

http://forums.contractoruk.com/gener...ob-advert.html

http://forums.contractoruk.com/gener...eing-done.html (which just refers to the one above)

[Incognito]

Not quite the attitude a mod should display.

WHS

[ratewhore]

I'm still in favour of anyone who links to the daily wail receiving an automatic ban.

Not quite the attitude a mod should display.

Sack him!! No - take his skis away...

[mrdonuts]

I'm still in favour of anyone who links to the daily wail receiving an automatic ban.

talk about having your head in the sand

[RichardCranium]

I'm still in favour of anyone who links to the daily wail receiving an automatic ban.

That would be a shame:

The Jobsite.co.uk advert was on behalf of a computer company based in Britain and India.

It stated: 'Minimum six years of experience in IT . . . The person should be a UK citizen with security clearance.'

That was probably the most on-topic post on this site for weeks. To be banned for that would be stupid.

And discriminatory.

And censorship.

So, calm down NAT.