• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Are they real? (inc. is Wilmslow really real III)"

Collapse

  • TimberWolf
    replied
    Hmm. Aside from a few loyal followers, few of those that voted believe sasguru is real - twice as many believe Wilmsow is real in fact, who incidentally helped bolster sasguru's vote by 1. DimPrawn hasn't convinced the majority that he exists either, though if collective decisions are anything to go by, it does appear that EO is real. Nevertheless Wilmslow is not universally recognised as being real, with only half of those voting being believers, but it's still a good turnout for him, especially when it's seasonally adjusted:

    It's a little uprising that AtW did not get more recognition, though no doubt part of this reason can be attributed to people not realising that it was a multiple choice poll and fecking up. So by extension everyone's vote can be climatically normalised by somewhere between a factor of 1 and 1.5, depending on which conclusion you wish to reach.

    Leave a comment:


  • HairyArsedBloke
    replied
    If they don't exist then where do their posts come from?

    Leave a comment:


  • Drewster
    replied
    Originally posted by Pogle View Post
    They may not say words, but they can communicate very well.


    Glad you like my avatar - Churchill says it looks just like me
    AtW says it looks like a stroppy little b*gger - and Churchy says it looks like you........... Mmmmmm Is Churchy really your friend?

    Leave a comment:


  • TheFaQQer
    replied
    Originally posted by DaveB View Post
    I'm still not convinced about Wilmslow.

    He's either a sockie of someone who was at the Manchester do, or it's all a drunken conspiracy by those who were, or both.
    I have been convinced by others more in the know than I.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by Pogle View Post
    They may not say words, but they can communicate very well.

    Leave a comment:


  • Pogle
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    To be fair guinea pigs don't speak either.

    Also, while on that subject - I do find your avatar very much having a challenging look - it's like provoking me
    They may not say words, but they can communicate very well.


    Glad you like my avatar - Churchill says it looks just like me

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by Pogle View Post
    The guinea pig never lies

    - shame on you for doubting me
    To be fair guinea pigs don't speak either.

    Also, while on that subject - I do find your avatar very much having a challenging look - it's like provoking me

    Leave a comment:


  • Pogle
    replied
    Originally posted by DaveB View Post
    I'm still not convinced about Wilmslow.

    He's either a sockie of someone who was at the Manchester do, or it's all a drunken conspiracy by those who were, or both.
    The guinea pig never lies

    - shame on you for doubting me

    Leave a comment:


  • EternalOptimist
    replied
    Originally posted by DaveB View Post
    I'm still not convinced about Wilmslow.

    He's either a sockie of someone who was at the Manchester do, or it's all a drunken conspiracy by those who were, or both.
    If I had a pound for everone I have im'ed about this. I would have £2

    it's not a conspiracy, the Wilmslow you see here is real, and a fine fellow he is too. I wish all the best to his finger and his back. and the rest of him.


    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by DaveB View Post
    I'm still not convinced about Wilmslow.

    He's either a sockie of someone who was at the Manchester do, or it's all a drunken conspiracy by those who were, or both.
    WIS

    Leave a comment:


  • DaveB
    replied
    I'm still not convinced about Wilmslow.

    He's either a sockie of someone who was at the Manchester do, or it's all a drunken conspiracy by those who were, or both.

    Leave a comment:


  • TheFaQQer
    replied
    Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
    In Firefox the bar in the graph is only a few pixels wide against your name Seems okay in IE though.
    Looks fine in FF on Linux.

    Leave a comment:


  • EternalOptimist
    replied
    Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
    In Firefox the bar in the graph is only a few pixels wide against your name Seems okay in IE though.
    even technology conspires against me. nuthing works - Catweazle



    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Post
    low turnout always favours the extreme candidate at the expense of the more moderate ,mature ,dignified and dare I say, good-looking candidate <cough>



    In Firefox the bar in the graph is only a few pixels wide against your name Seems okay in IE though.

    Leave a comment:


  • minestrone
    replied
    wibbleski

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X