Originally posted by Mich the Tester
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: more LHC woes
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "more LHC woes"
Collapse
-
I fracking hope so. Wish they'd do it here as well. I urge you all to checkout how much council tax you are paying goes towards "housing and council tax benefits" and how much this increases every year.
-
Will we be allowed to blow it up then?Originally posted by hyperD View PostThen the LHC will be turned into council houses for Euro-chavs with their baby buggy mothers.
Leave a comment:
-
Bah!
It'll all end up being an expensive waste of time. It will prove nothing and they will desperately resort to getting hold of those CRU Hadley "scientists" who tried to lie and cheat us with this Global Warming bollox to try and spin this as a success.
Nobody will believe them and disappointment will ensue as no sliding Star Trek doors will be made and no transporters and eventually it will all be ignored as Jordan will suddenly after Max Cliffords approval declare her breasts officially open to the public.
Then the LHC will be turned into council houses for Euro-chavs with their baby buggy mothers.
Leave a comment:
-
it already has done all these things you all fear so much
you are just stuck in the event horizon and have not noticed.
Leave a comment:
-
FFS is that the best you can do?Originally posted by AtW View PostJust terabytes? FFS, SKA deals with PETABYTES now.
Leave a comment:
-
Collisions between particles with this sort of energy happen all the time. The point of the LHC is to let us control them and observe them in detail so that we can study them and learn from them, not to do something that hasn't occurred for 14 billion years and may result in the destruction of the known universe.Originally posted by CERNThough considerably higher than the energies of previous accelerators, these energies are still far below those of the highest-energy cosmic-ray collisions that are observed regularly on Earth.
Leave a comment:
-
Definites:Originally posted by AtW View PostWhat benefits EXACTLY?
New techniques for analysis of terabytes of data
Maybes:
Understanding of the basis of sub-atomic particles
Long shots:
Free Energy
These are just for starters - there's probably 5-10 other reasons in each category.
Leave a comment:
-
Even if it did create a black hole (extremely unlikely), the chances of it staying open are extremely unlikely cubed.Originally posted by AtW View PostYou can't say it for sure - what they are trying to do is unexplored and they in their own words trying to recreate conditions that existed before or around Big Bang - this certainly does not sound like some cuddly fluffy animals.
I say give each of those bozos a million dollars to retire and write books how evil Govt did not allow them to conduct their research. Beats turning earth into new Sun or a blackhole
The potential benefits of this research FAR outweigh the risk of gravitational annihilation.
Leave a comment:
-
No, but it risks turning CUK's inhabitants into the living dead.Originally posted by AtW View PostMy technology does not carry a risk of turning Earth into lifeless ball floating in cold space.
Leave a comment:
-
My technology does not carry a risk of turning Earth into lifeless ball floating in cold space.Originally posted by DiscoStu View PostFunny how someone who makes a living from technology all of a sudden becomes a Luddite.
I guess one needs a small amount of brain cells to see the difference in terms of risk between what I do and what they do. Also cost of my work is not paid by taxpayers.
Leave a comment:
-
Funny how someone who makes a living from technology all of a sudden becomes a Luddite.Originally posted by AtW View PostYou can't say it for sure - what they are trying to do is unexplored and they in their own words trying to recreate conditions that existed before or around Big Bang - this certainly does not sound like some cuddly fluffy animals.
I say give each of those bozos a million dollars to retire and write books how evil Govt did not allow them to conduct their research. Beats turning earth into new Sun or a blackhole
Leave a comment:
-
You can't say it for sure - what they are trying to do is unexplored and they in their own words trying to recreate conditions that existed before or around Big Bang - this certainly does not sound like some cuddly fluffy animals.Originally posted by Moscow Mule View PostNeither does the LHC....
I say give each of those bozos a million dollars to retire and write books how evil Govt did not allow them to conduct their research. Beats turning earth into new Sun or a blackhole
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How a buyer’s market in UK property for 2026 is contractors’ double-edge sword Today 07:12
- Why PAYE overcharging by HMRC is every contractor’s problem Yesterday 06:26
- Government unveils ‘Umbrella Company Regulations consultation’ Feb 9 05:55
- JSL rules ‘are HMRC’s way to make contractor umbrella company clients give a sh*t where their money goes’ Feb 8 07:42
- Contractors warned over HMRC charging £3.5 billion too much Feb 6 03:18
- Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) for umbrella company contractors: an April 2026 explainer Feb 5 07:19
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Feb 4 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Feb 3 07:47
- Business expenses: What IT contractors can and cannot claim from HMRC Jan 30 08:44
- April’s umbrella PAYE risk: how contractors’ end-clients are prepping Jan 29 05:45

Leave a comment: