Reply to: Global Warming for Dummies

[BlasterBates]

Interesting why?

Why do you think?

[sasguru]

interesting comment

Interesting why?

[sasguru]

From sasguru?
That'd be a first!!!

You wouldn't know an interesting comment if it rose up and bit you on your oversized bottom.

HTH

[Drewster]

Page 22

Anyway I declare this thread closed.
.....
Good bye.

Pages ad infinitum

.....blah blah......

.....blah blah......

.....blah blah......

................

.....blah blah......

.....blah blah......

.....blah blah......

.....blah blah......

Go on SAS you have the last word mate.........

[shaunbhoy]

interesting comment

From sasguru?
That'd be a first!!!

[BlasterBates]

interesting comment

[sasguru]

thx

Check out Roy Spencer's website on how to correct the temp dataset

http://www.drroyspencer.com/

This will the subject of a paper, and with Spencer's reputation will probably be accepted for publication.

HTH

You're just a big wind up merchant aren't you.

[BlasterBates]

Goto 1,2,3,4,5

especially 5.

HTH

thx

Check out Roy Spencer's website on how to correct the temp dataset

http://www.drroyspencer.com/

This will the subject of a paper, and with Spencer's reputation will probably be accepted for publication.

Will probably succeed in reconciling that divergence between Satellite data and land temps.


HTH

[doodab]

To achieve an exponential rate of CO2 emissions like that, we'd have to achieve an exponential rate of burning.

Is there enough fuel left in the ground to do that until 2050?

Possibly.

http://www.scientificamerican.com/ar...-oil-edit-this

[Doggy Styles]

At the current growth rate of approx 1.9 ppm (I've taken a 5 year moving average of the data BB linked to) we should have CO2 levels around 470ppm by 2050.

However, if you look at a moving average of the data it seems that the rate of increase is in fact increasing, from around 0.9 ppm per year in 1970 to around 1.9 ppm per year today. If that increase continues, we should be on course to reach or exceed the IPCC projection.

To achieve an exponential rate of CO2 emissions like that, we'd have to achieve an exponential rate of burning.

Is there enough fuel left in the ground to do that until 2050?

[sasguru]

a good link to get a view of the disarray in the temperature data set

Goto 1,2,3,4,5

especially 5.

HTH

[BlasterBates]

a good link to get a view of the disarray in the temperature data set

[sasguru]

it is important to have all the facts on the table.

Facts I can deal with.
Graphs from nutty teachers I can't.

[sasguru]

Anyway let the object observer decide.
I'm almost embarassed to discredit your links. Its too easy.
.

[BlasterBates]

it is important to have all the facts on the table.