• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "I'd just like to make this point..."

Collapse

  • Bagpuss
    replied
    Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
    I love the term snatch Landrover.
    Sounds like something you mighy expect to see at a Young Farmers' disco.

    Leave a comment:


  • MarillionFan
    replied
    Originally posted by Churchill View Post
    It's not acceptable at any point.
    It's valid question. But that is a populist answer. It may not be 'acceptable' but there does have to be a decision.

    In the terms of a government, project, company. There are a number of finite resources that can be allocated to any one area. Army, NHS, Public services etc. Each one of these good have better equipment, and if I changed the question to any of these the answer would be the same.

    In IT the adage goes, give me enough money, people and time and I'll deliver whatever you want. The same is true everywhere.

    I agree though, more unfortunate victims of war.

    Leave a comment:


  • Churchill
    replied
    Originally posted by MarillionFan View Post
    Serious question Churchill.

    At which point is it acceptable for a government to draw a line under a sliding scale of investment in the armed forces in terms of security/body armour/armoured vehicles/latest equipment etc versus the safety of the armed forces themselves?
    It's not acceptable at any point.

    If you expect our boys and girls to do a job you damn well make sure that they have the relevant equipment and skills to do it!

    However, the SAS boys and the girl were in the right vehicle for the particular job they were doing - they were just unlucky. Victims of war.

    Leave a comment:


  • Pondlife
    replied
    Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
    You can't beat a good snatch.
    This is about weightlifting, right?

    Leave a comment:


  • chef
    replied
    Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
    You can't beat a good snatch.
    <snigger>

    Leave a comment:


  • doodab
    replied
    I'm thinking rand(y) snatch lover.

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    You can't beat a good snatch.

    Leave a comment:


  • MarillionFan
    replied
    Originally posted by Churchill View Post
    ..."Snatch Landrovers" are not meant to be bomb-proof.

    They are "relatively" light, powerful vehicles that are meant to get in, deploy/collect and then get the hell out of Dodge.

    Hth.
    Serious question Churchill.

    At which point is it acceptable for a government to draw a line under a sliding scale of investment in the armed forces in terms of security/body armour/armoured vehicles/latest equipment etc versus the safety of the armed forces themselves?

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
    I love the term snatch Landrover.
    Not when you are in it whilst Explosively Formed Penetrator hits you...

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    I love the term snatch Landrover.

    Leave a comment:


  • Churchill
    started a topic I'd just like to make this point...

    I'd just like to make this point...

    ..."Snatch Landrovers" are not meant to be bomb-proof.

    They are "relatively" light, powerful vehicles that are meant to get in, deploy/collect and then get the hell out of Dodge.

    Hth.

Working...
X