• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: Shameful display

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Shameful display"

Collapse

  • shaunbhoy
    replied
    Originally posted by mrdonuts View Post
    yup hit a nerve there

    dirty beast and shaunboy emoticons to follow




    Ah........the inevitable toxic consequences of Security Firms allowing their operatives to have Web access.

    Leave a comment:


  • mrdonuts
    replied
    Originally posted by shaunbhoy View Post
    Another high quality post brimming with intellectual nuances and subtlety.

    Keep up the good work cloth-ears.
    yup hit a nerve there

    dirty beast and shaunboy emoticons to follow




    Leave a comment:


  • shaunbhoy
    replied
    Originally posted by mrdonuts View Post
    and the dirty beasts are mincers as well by the sounds of it

    maybe shaunboy has some knowledge of this
    Another high quality post brimming with intellectual nuances and subtlety.

    Keep up the good work cloth-ears.

    Leave a comment:


  • mrdonuts
    replied
    Originally posted by Incognito View Post
    Your team is mince as is your manager.
    and the dirty beasts are mincers as well by the sounds of it

    maybe shaunboy has some knowledge of this

    Leave a comment:


  • minestrone
    replied
    Wilson's was a 50 50. Could have gone either way, the cardigan though otherwise though.

    Leave a comment:


  • Incognito
    replied
    Originally posted by minestrone View Post
    Thompson's challenge was quite simply atrocious and the fact that they expected to get away with that is simply a sign of how much they have been getting away with all season.

    Studs showing going through a man from behind at full pelt on a stationary player, yes that is not a sending off
    Agree with you Thomson should have walked, thought Wilson's was a bit harsh. However, we got nothing the whole game. Very suspicious, seems like someones not been paying their lodge fees.

    Leave a comment:


  • minestrone
    replied
    Thompson's challenge was quite simply atrocious and the fact that they expected to get away with that is simply a sign of how much they have been getting away with all season.

    Studs showing going through a man from behind at full pelt on a stationary player, yes that is not a sending off

    Leave a comment:


  • Incognito
    replied
    Originally posted by shaunbhoy View Post
    This week's selection of "honest mistakes" that benefit Rangers..............
    Okay, it's official. Scottish referees do make mistakes.

    Rangers just get on and deal with it though.

    Rangers - dignity F.C

    Leave a comment:


  • Incognito
    replied
    I think Dusan got the ball with his foot and the forward motion of Kenny Miller, who had knocked it a yard or so further forward than he wanted to, made Dusan decide to go for it with his feet
    Watch that video and tell me honestly you think Dusan touched the ball with his foot first before touching Miller.

    Originally posted by shaunbhoy View Post
    Hey Incog,
    just for you. Spreading the word................



    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WfQNm...layer_embedded
    I prefer mine



    I have my tickets for Vegas '10. I'll send you the championee link when we upload it to youtube

    Leave a comment:


  • shaunbhoy
    replied
    Peter Houston insists referee Dougie McDonald was wrong on both occasions to award Rangers two penalties in Sunday's 3-3 Scottish Cup tie at Ibrox.

    "I am disappointed and I just wonder if the penalties would have been given at the other end. I hope they would have been," said the Dundee United manager.

    "Dougie is an honest referee in normal circumstances, I think he is one of the best in Scotland.

    "But I was disappointed that he got there early to give the penalty kicks."

    With United leading by an Andis Shala goal, Rangers were awarded a penalty in the 34th minute when the visitors' goalkeeper, Dusan Pernis, appeared to foul striker Kenny Miller.

    Television replays, however, suggest that Pernis did get a touch on the ball but the incident happened at such a pace that McDonald had a split second to make a very difficult call.

    Pernis was yellow carded and Rangers leading goalscorer Kris Boyd slotted home the spot kick to level the score.

    "Dusan Pernis got a touch on the ball, and Kenny, with the momentum of two bodies coming together, fell over Dusan because he was on the ground," said Houston on BBC Radio Scotland's Sportsound programme on Monday.

    "I think Dusan got the ball with his foot and the forward motion of Kenny Miller, who had knocked it a yard or so further forward than he wanted to, made Dusan decide to go for it with his feet."

    And the United manager added: "The second one, if we are going to give penalty kicks for that, we'll get penalty kicks left, right and centre on a regular basis.

    "I don't think for a minute Sean Dillon deliberately pushed Kris Boyd.

    "Kris kept his eye on the ball and they bumped into each other.

    "I'm not blaming Kris Boyd at all for going down easily. He didn't have any eye contact with Sean Dillon, he was looking at the ball."

    "I've got to be honest and say I felt they were two soft penalties
    The more things change etc..............

    TaintedTitlesLoyal

    Leave a comment:


  • shaunbhoy
    replied
    Hey Incog,
    just for you. Spreading the word................



    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WfQNm...layer_embedded

    Leave a comment:


  • doodab
    replied
    Originally posted by Incognito View Post
    And where pray tell would the ugly sister waltz away to?? Irish league?? Basque B division?? Palestinian solidarity brothers division 3??
    http://www.bluesqfootball.com/

    http://www.rymanleague.com/leagues?l...d=256&did=2102

    HTH

    Leave a comment:


  • Incognito
    replied
    Originally posted by shaunbhoy View Post
    its proud record of institutionalised bias well to the fore as Rangers strive to stave off bankruptcy.
    Sorry to burst the bubble buddy, but Rangers won't be going bankrupt anytime soon, league or no league. the reason Lloyds stepped in was because they wanted the club to stop living in the overdraft. The overdraft was circa £6m and will be paid off with the CL money incoming. the rest of the debt is long term and the repayments for that are around £1m a year. What we have done this year is reduce our outgoings so that they are about half of Celtics (main rivals). We are in a far better position than your club to survive without CL money.

    All this tinhat tomfoolerey from the ones with the chips on their shoulder is deflecting from the main reason why you are 13 points behind with a vastly inferior goal difference. Your team is mince as is your manager.

    Originally posted by shaunbhoy View Post
    If Rangers go to the wall then Celtic will walk away.
    And where pray tell would the ugly sister waltz away to?? Irish league?? Basque B division?? Palestinian solidarity brothers division 3??
    Last edited by Incognito; 15 March 2010, 22:49.

    Leave a comment:


  • shaunbhoy
    replied
    Let's face it, Rangers benefitting from suspect decisions is becoming a weekly event. It would be laughable in any other League in the world, but sadly not in the SPL, with its proud record of institutionalised bias well to the fore as Rangers strive to stave off bankruptcy. If Rangers go to the wall then Celtic will walk away. That will cause the whole thing to cave in and all the vested interests and "Jobs for the Boys" dry up overnight. Not hard to spot the self-perpetuating agenda.
    Join me here next week for the next batch of "these things even themselves out over the season" codswallop.

    Leave a comment:


  • Incognito
    replied
    Shawny lad, I'm getting worried about you. You're beginning to slaver at the mouth.

    Miller's goal - Pass was released at 11 seconds, Dods was playing Miller onside, Boyd was not interfering with play. At 44 seconds you clearly see the contact with Miller was before he got hands to the ball. Miller was going round him. Goalscoring chance.

    Boyd's goal - 23 seconds in you clearly see Dillon barge Boyd. The penalty was not given for Boyd falling on his arse, it was given for the interference when Boyd was in a goalscoring chance. Dillon had no intention of playing for the ball, his intention was to put Boyd off.

    http://www.eveningtimes.co.uk/sport/...ager-1.1013500

    How did the referee do?

    Dougie McDonald got both penalty decisions – after Dusan Pernis’s foul on Kenny Miller and Sean Dillon’s push on Kris Boyd - correct. He was also right just to give Pernis a yellow card and not a red for his foul on Miller as the Gers striker was not heading directly at goal, as the rules state he must, at the moment of contact.
    Do you think the Celtic store will be doing one of these in Green and White for next year?

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X