Originally posted by RichardCranium
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Should we, or shouldn't we?
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Should we, or shouldn't we?"
Collapse
-
I read a project plan last year that included the words "The only alternative is to do nothing. However, doing nothing would fail to meet the objectives of the project."Originally posted by thunderlizard View PostI like it when people say that because, of course, doing nothing is the only thing that is always an option.
Leave a comment:
-
Are you sure? Perhaps you should start a poll.Originally posted by MarillionFan View PostThis is stupid. It's not if Should we, or shouldn't we? it should be Did you or Didn't you?
Leave a comment:
-
This is stupid. It's not if Should we, or shouldn't we? it should be Did you or Didn't you?
Leave a comment:
-
So is that your decision?Originally posted by Drewster View PostWell - I'm still undecided can I abstain?
Leave a comment:
-
Leave well alone. If it ain't broke, don't fix it. If it is broke, don't make it worse.
Leave a comment:
-
Doing nothing is not an option.
I like it when people say that because, of course, doing nothing is the only thing that is always an option.
Leave a comment:
-
Is that what you think?Originally posted by Zippy View PostYou don't care what I think
Leave a comment:
-
Such is CUK. But never mind that.Originally posted by Zippy View PostI have no idea what this thread is about
Should we or shouldn't we? What do you think?
Leave a comment:
-
-
I don't think putting off making the decision is tenable.Originally posted by Drewster View PostI'm not sure... can you give me a moment....
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- HMRC standstill agreements extended to 72 months: why the term's doubled, and what to check before signing Jul 31 05:53
- Who owns the loans? Inside the mystery of the loan charge recall scandal Today 06:20
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Yesterday 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Jul 28 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58
- Andy Burnham is PM: 5 new IT policies set to shape UK tech and its contractors Jul 20 06:29
- Taxed on money I haven't earned yet? Bold move, HMRC Jul 17 08:36

Leave a comment: