Originally posted by Jeebo72
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Which car would you go for?
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Which car would you go for?"
Collapse
-
Just like you can judge footballers?Originally posted by Jeebo72 View PostYou can always judge the quality of a contractor by their car...
Leave a comment:
-
What's all this 2.0d and 2.2d stuff? You'd be better off with a 3.2litre like mine, bought 3 years ago for £6K (which included a £3K insurance payout for my previous Jag which I totalled).Originally posted by Wilmslow View PostIt is the 2.0d - I drive it quite a lot going up to Scotland - feels fine on the motorway. Not into drag racing at lights so not an issue for me. It is a heavy car, but handles pretty good......
Garaged when not in use, mileage is 95% motorway, half of which I have driven in it as visiting relatives with my mum in Scotland.
Leave a comment:
-
Question is are you happy to look 15-20 years older than you really are by driving round in a X type. Sports gear or not... old mans car.X type jag diesel estate, 2003, sport edition with in-built sat nav
Leave a comment:
-
Pretty sure the depreciation costs on that Jag will be higher than the Ford. Would be interesting to see what the dealer will offer on each one.
Leave a comment:
-
You need an XF. Other than that, I'd stick with the focus. More reliable and economical, less service costs too.
Leave a comment:
-
That fine then, yes they do handle well, I had the 2.2d a really enjoyed it.
However like a lot of cars originally designed for petrol engines and than have a great heavy diesel put in they suffer with suspension wear and wheel bearings. Also chew front tyres. But maybe cos I couldn't drive sedately.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Today 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Yesterday 07:47
- Business expenses: What IT contractors can and cannot claim from HMRC Jan 30 08:44
- April’s umbrella PAYE risk: how contractors’ end-clients are prepping Jan 29 05:45
- How EV tax changes of 2025-2028 add up for contractor limited company directors Jan 28 08:11
- Under the terms he was shackled by, Ray McCann’s Loan Charge Review probably is a fair resolution Jan 27 08:41
- Contractors, a £25million crackdown on rogue company directors is coming Jan 26 05:02
- How to run a contractor limited company — efficiently. Part one: software Jan 22 23:31
- Forget February as an MSC contractor seeking clarity, and maybe forget fairness altogether Jan 22 19:57
- What contractors should take from Honest Payroll Ltd’s failure Jan 21 07:05


Leave a comment: