• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Just as we all thought - January was the warmest month ever"

Collapse

  • Doggy Styles
    replied
    I don't actually understand the original post.

    Not for the first time, and it won't be the last I'm sure.

    Leave a comment:


  • Halcyon
    replied
    Originally posted by Troll View Post
    Latest wheeze is to convert Limestone to Lime and then tip that into the ocean to make it less acidic...heard some bearded geek talking about the amount needed to be mined in Australia to make the plan work & it was serious tonnage
    Had said bearded geek bought a coal mine, only to find out that actually it only contains limestone...

    Leave a comment:


  • Troll
    replied
    Latest wheeze is to convert Limestone to Lime and then tip that into the ocean to make it less acidic...heard some bearded geek talking about the amount needed to be mined in Australia to make the plan work & it was serious tonnage

    Little thought seemed to have been given to the CO2 footprint of the mining and converting operation but it sounded like it was all going to end in tears.

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
    Or you might be able to claim the same over hundreds of years if you include increases in oceanic CO2 (which are making the oceans more acidic, and will reach a limit at some point).
    That can't be good for crushedasians (specifically their shells).

    Leave a comment:


  • OwlHoot
    replied
    Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
    If you apply some "smoothing" to the temp data and start the CO2 data from the 1970's rather than hundreds of years ago, and change the scale of the CO2 data, you can probably overlay the two and say "Look! temp follows the CO2 output! Doomed!" ...
    Or you might be able to claim the same over hundreds of years if you include increases in oceanic CO2 (which are making the oceans more acidic, and will reach a limit at some point).

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    If you apply some "smoothing" to the temp data and start the CO2 data from the 1970's rather than hundreds of years ago, and change the scale of the CO2 data, you can probably overlay the two and say "Look! temp follows the CO2 output! Doomed!"

    sasguru would believe it anyway.

    Leave a comment:


  • BlasterBates
    replied
    Chart clearly showing the relationship between CO2 levels and temp

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    Hard to imagine Swindon not being the centre of the world, eh?

    Leave a comment:


  • Just as we all thought - January was the warmest month ever

    http://davidappell.blogspot.com/2010...uary-ever.html

    The Univ of Alabama at Huntsville satellite data also says that last month was the warmest January in their records: +0.724°C above their baseline.


    Phew wot a scorcher!

Working...
X