Originally posted by scooterscot
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Fighting the machine...
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Fighting the machine..."
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Doggy Styles View PostI just tried doing this for my day return from London to Carlisle. It looked like it might be cheaper, but I lost the will to live and gave up, so congratulations on seeing it through.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by scooterscot View PostMade it...
Edinburgh to Cambridge £24, same train most of the way as my previous £240 fare.
Was not challenged once yet my more expensive ticket always got the conductor up in arms cause the Scot Executive package was not recognised.
Leave a comment:
-
Made it...
Edinburgh to Cambridge £24, same train most of the way as my previous £240 fare.
Was not challenged once yet my more expensive ticket always got the conductor up in arms cause the Scot Executive package was not recognised.
Leave a comment:
-
That's what gets you in the end, you get frustrated and just buy the one ticket.
It should not be like this...
Leave a comment:
-
I just tried doing this for my day return from London to Carlisle. It looked like it might be cheaper, but I lost the will to live and gave up, so congratulations on seeing it through.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Paddy View Post
I can't find any ticket between Peterborough and Edinburgh for £16. Is this fare on Thetrainline? If so these tickets can not be used in conjunction with other tickets however, when I do so; I get off and back on the train!
Here it is £16 for 300 miles...
https://tickets.eastcoast.co.uk/ec/e...=NoModifyGuest
Leave a comment:
-
The next step is to buy 10 season tickets to ensure maximum savings potential
Leave a comment:
-
Perfectly legal - been around for a few years - called split ticketing. The only condition is that the train must stop at the stations you split your ticket on (which it will if you are using advance purchase tickets for specific trains).
It occurs because train companies charge to meet expectations of people to pay. People won't pay extortionate prices for short trips, but are more prepared to stump up the cash for longer trips.
Also if you buy over the counter/phone, they must sell you any combination of tickets you ask for. But if you ask for a "return to ...", they will sell you exactly what you asked for - even though there are cheaper options available.
As train companies notice that more and more of these combinations are being sold, they tend to close down the options, usually by increasing the shorter distance fares, figuring it's better to lose a few short journey fares than suffer a large scale loss of their core fares.Last edited by centurian; 7 February 2010, 13:48.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by scooterscot View PostOk I've spent some hours figuring this out, 3 of them to be exact.
Last week my return to Cambridge cost me £264 on the East Coast line.
My matrix of sorts in excel records the cost station to station all the way from Edinburgh to Cambridge and back again.
I've just gone to the station and printed off 10 tickets at the machine (it took the machine a minute and a queue built up behind me fairly quickly as I waited)
Its cost me £47!!
And I'll be using the same train as I did last week
One section of the journey I have a ticket for a price of £16 from Peterborough to Edinburgh!
This system is MAD
At Paddyville, stations near London are considerably cheaper but also stations further away are cheaper to travel to London. SW Trains specifically forbid boarding and alighting at any stations other that what’s on the ticket (cheap tickets). So much for the free market.
I can't find any ticket between Peterborough and Edinburgh for £16. Is this fare on Thetrainline? If so these tickets can not be used in conjunction with other tickets however, when I do so; I get off and back on the train!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by NickFitz View PostHe isn't making one journey and breaking it, he is making multiple journeys all of which happen to be served by the same train.
In fact, this technique is frequently suggested as an effective way of cutting the cost of train travel
Originally posted by NickFitz View Postthere is nothing in the National Rail Conditions of Carriage to forbid it - a fact even ATOC accept.
Although I wish they had quoted their source for the unattributed statement:
It’s perfectly allowed within the National Rail Conditions of Carriage, and has been confirmed by the Association of Train Operating Companies (ATOC). The
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by RichardCranium View PostI disagree with your interpretation of:asAlthough the intention of the original wording was to stop you using a one-way ticket as a wy to visit every town on the route, that is not what it says.
He is breaking his journey without making use of a connecting train. He is arriving at an intermediate station and is then failing to use a connecting train and is, instead, travelling on a different ticket on the same train to complete his journey.
I would expect a court to recognise his journey is between the extreme ends of his trip on the railway network. He is not even getting off the train, and if he did, he would immediately get back on. So he is clearly using unnecessary complexity to evade paying the full fare for the journey by abusing the flexibility of the ticket system. That is, he is pretending to break his journey so as to avoid paying a larger fare and this is apparent by his having neither need nor desire to use a connecting train. And I would not be at all surprised at a ticket inspector using that argument to demand more money, nor at a train company taking the matter to court.
(But I also think ScooterScot should go ahead and do it anyway.)
In fact, this technique is frequently suggested as an effective way of cutting the cost of train travel, as there is nothing in the National Rail Conditions of Carriage to forbid it - a fact even ATOC accept.
The one potential problem would be the seat change at Newcastle: a particularly mardy inspector could swoop at that point, as the Ts & Cs clearly state that "Where applicable, you must travel in the Class and reserved seat(s) shown on the ticket(s)." The safest thing is to move to the correct seat, as otherwise the ticket is technically invalid.
Oh, of course the other catch is that the train must actually be scheduled to stop at each station: get that wrong and you're screwed.
Leave a comment:
-
Edit: * What ScooterScot did is kosher. See NF's link below. *
I disagree with your interpretation of:You may not ... break and resume ... your journey at any intermediate station except to change to/from connecting trainsOriginally posted by NickFitz View Post- "Break and resume": one is not allowed to get off at B and then resume the journey on a later train to C, except for the purpose of changing to a connecting train.
He is breaking his journey without making use of a connecting train. He is arriving at an intermediate station and is then failing to use a connecting train and is, instead, travelling on a different ticket on the same train to complete his journey.
I would expect a court to recognise his journey is between the extreme ends of his trip on the railway network. He is not even getting off the train, and if he did, he would immediately get back on. So he is clearly using unnecessary complexity to evade paying the full fare for the journey by abusing the flexibility of the ticket system. That is, he is pretending to break his journey so as to avoid paying a larger fare and this is apparent by his having neither need nor desire to use a connecting train. And I would not be at all surprised at a ticket inspector using that argument to demand more money, nor at a train company taking the matter to court.
(But I also think ScooterScot should go ahead and do it anyway.)
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Leave a comment: