• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Offshoring - The Moral & Economic Case"

Collapse

  • pzz76077
    replied
    Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Post
    yeesss, but what type of sp*nk-rag are we talking here ?

    The Aristotelian idealist 'form' of the sp*nk-rag or the Marxist dialectical materialist 'actual' sp*nk-rag


    I am not sure


    Marxist, no doubt about it.

    PZZ

    Leave a comment:


  • pzz76077
    replied
    Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Post
    yeah. the w @nker



    Yea, WHS with bells on..

    PZZ

    Leave a comment:


  • EternalOptimist
    replied
    Originally posted by phil5476 View Post
    Oh right now I see.........

    http://forums.contractoruk.com/gener...-pzz76077.html

    Sp*nk-rag
    yeesss, but what type of sp*nk-rag are we talking here ?

    The Aristotelian idealist 'form' of the sp*nk-rag or the Marxist dialectical materialist 'actual' sp*nk-rag


    I am not sure


    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    Originally posted by Francko View Post
    Yes, given the current state of the market the best strategy appears to be to re-skill in something different than IT.
    Most reasonably intelligent people can buy a book and "skill" themselves in a given programming language in a few months at the most. Low barriers to entry - hence the commoditisation of IT.

    So yes reskill in something that has high barriers to entry either because (1) it is a closed shop, like being a barrister in England or (2) requires an IQ in the top level of the population or (3) requires a long series of gruelling exams like chartered accountancy.

    As (1) or (2) are not possible for you, I would suggest (3).

    Leave a comment:


  • Francko
    replied
    Originally posted by phil5476 View Post
    That is the strategy i'm taking. That said adapting the legal framework to benefit the government & people is a good way to overcome.
    Yes, given the current state of the market the best strategy appears to be to re-skill in something different than IT.

    Leave a comment:


  • phil5476
    replied
    Oh right now I see.........

    http://forums.contractoruk.com/gener...-pzz76077.html

    Sp*nk-rag

    Leave a comment:


  • EternalOptimist
    replied
    Originally posted by phil5476 View Post
    Pzz,

    You didn't spend anytime reading the OP did you.

    I've been reading this thread trying to discern what your argument actually is. You seem to hop from 'its racist' to 'offshoring is ok' to some lightweight economic arguments.

    I made the OP quite specific in the hope that it would stimulate some reasoned debate and AVOID getting bogged down in irrelevant offshoots. But you managed to screw that up. Funny thing about people who don't want to take the time to understand something is that they always try and bring everyone down to their level.
    yeah. the w @nker



    Leave a comment:


  • phil5476
    replied
    Pzz,

    You didn't spend anytime reading the OP did you.

    I've been reading this thread trying to discern what your argument actually is. You seem to hop from 'its racist' to 'offshoring is ok' to some lightweight economic arguments.

    I made the OP quite specific in the hope that it would stimulate some reasoned debate and AVOID getting bogged down in irrelevant offshoots. But you managed to screw that up. Funny thing about people who don't want to take the time to understand something is that they always try and bring everyone down to their level.

    Leave a comment:


  • phil5476
    replied
    Originally posted by cojak View Post
    Adapt, re-skill and overcome (or roll over and die), innit...
    That is the strategy i'm taking. That said adapting the legal framework to benefit the government & people is a good way to overcome.

    Leave a comment:


  • phil5476
    replied
    Originally posted by pzz76077 View Post
    QUOTE:
    'It is about Indian staff are body shopped into UK offices. Last year there were by some estimates 55000 'offshore' people onshore. Many of these roles (in my experience) are not suitable to be located in India. So that's c.55000 UK redundancies.'

    The core of your argument is completely wrong. 55k ICT's did not lead to 55k UK redundancies.

    The options were, 55k ICTs come here to work or the work gets done by 55k Indians in India.
    Which of these is best for the UK ??

    PZZ
    All my arguments are wrong to you as you don't even read the bits you quote.

    Leave a comment:


  • minestrone
    replied
    If someone comes into the country from out with the EU to work then their employers should be forced to pay them the top percentile rather than the lowest percentile wages like just now, that way you can be sure the local labour market is truly exhausted and you are only hiring the very best from outside.

    It would never happen though.

    Leave a comment:


  • Francko
    replied
    Originally posted by Churchill View Post
    You could always bugger off to Italy! Those Olives won't pick themselves!
    I bugger off every weekend for shopping there. I am about 25 km off from the border. :-)

    Problem is that an IT consultant in Italy has always made the same money as an olive picker.

    Leave a comment:


  • HairyArsedBloke
    replied
    Originally posted by doodab View Post
    Top skills for the new economy:

    Lying
    Cheating
    Stealing
    I'm BOOOOOOOOOMED!

    Leave a comment:


  • doodab
    replied
    Top skills for the new economy:

    Lying
    Cheating
    Stealing

    Leave a comment:


  • HairyArsedBloke
    replied
    Originally posted by Lockhouse View Post
    p.s. I don't go sarf of the river. Before you ask.
    That's alright, I never go sarf of the river anyway. I'm not sure I would ever want to ride in a cab where the driver would go sarf, who knows what you could catch in that cab.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X