• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "browns scorched earth policy"

Collapse

  • Paddy
    replied
    Originally posted by ratewhore View Post
    Never heard that, is this true? Lots of parties fall under the banner 'Cypriot', so which do you mean?
    There is only one recognised government in Cyprus, the Turkish occupied North is only recognised by Turkey. Turkey sent thousands of poor families to occupy the land after the invasion. I have a great liking for both Turks and Greeks.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4lwdj...eature=related


    http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/j...TRY=1&SRETRY=0

    An extrapolation, analysis and evaluation of papers recently released by the British government suggest that, backstage, the British and US governments condoned Turkish military objectives in Cyprus, at least to the extent of agreeing to take no serious action to dissuade Turkey from invading. The papers suggest British government foreknowledge of Turkey's objectives; Henry Kissinger's express delaying tactics to afford Turkey more time to consolidate its invasion; French anger at the Foreign Office for not providing them with information; British concern about a future Greek government turning to the French for support; and the British government's desire to give up its military territories in Cyprus. Overall, the picture which emerges is that the Wilson government gave in to Henry Kissinger's policies. It appears clear that Britain, despite its responsibilities and initial misgivings about Turkey's behaviour, gave the lead to the US.
    Last edited by Paddy; 1 February 2010, 18:07.

    Leave a comment:


  • ratewhore
    replied
    Originally posted by Paddy View Post
    They are supposed to be there with a long standing agreement with the Cypriots being if the island is attacked the British would defend the island however, when the Turks invaded the British flew out all British air defence and the instead the troops stood and watched. The Cypriots want the British out for braking the agreement
    Never heard that, is this true? Lots of parties fall under the banner 'Cypriot', so which do you mean?

    Leave a comment:


  • threaded
    replied
    Originally posted by xoggoth View Post
    Had the company I contracted to got the contract it would have been hero xoggoth sorting those helicopters. The problem was no documentation, it all had to be engineered from assembler code.
    If only ISVV was that simple.

    You also need to inspect the development methodologies, processes etc.. So it is not enough to just reverse engineer the code.

    Leave a comment:


  • Paddy
    replied
    Originally posted by minestrone View Post
    What about the 3,200 in Cyprus? There for the sun and wine?
    They are supposed to be there with a long standing agreement with the Cypriots being if the island is attacked the British would defend the island however, when the Turks invaded the British flew out all British air defence and the instead the troops stood and watched. The Cypriots want the British out for braking the agreement

    Leave a comment:


  • xoggoth
    replied
    Had the company I contracted to got the contract it would have been hero xoggoth sorting those helicopters. The problem was no documentation, it all had to be engineered from assembler code.

    Leave a comment:


  • Moscow Mule
    replied
    Originally posted by Tarquin Farquhar View Post
    I think we've lost Birmingham.
    Is it such a loss?

    Perhaps the Russians could build a bigger bypass so it's easier to avoid?

    Leave a comment:


  • chef
    replied
    no, I'd say Birmingham lost out on that one

    Leave a comment:


  • Tarquin Farquhar
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    We are already here
    I think we've lost Birmingham.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by minestrone View Post
    Are we still expecting the Ruskies to storm over the border?
    We are already here

    Leave a comment:


  • gingerjedi
    replied
    Originally posted by minestrone View Post
    What about the 3,200 in Cyprus? There for the sun and wine?
    Mostly RAF isn't it?

    The Prime Minister is talking to three Senior NCOs; one from each of his
    fighting forces.

    He asks each one what they would do if they woke up and found a deadly
    Camel spider in their tent on desert deployment?

    Army Sergeant : "I'd reach over, grab my bayonet and stab it to death!"

    Navy PO : "I'd reach over, grab my sea boot and batter it to death !"

    RAF Sergeant : "I'd reach over, pick up my 'phone, call reception and ask
    "who the feck put a tent up in my hotel room?"

    Leave a comment:


  • Moscow Mule
    replied
    Originally posted by minestrone View Post
    What about the 3,200 in Cyprus? There for the sun and wine?
    Protecting the (pretty handy) airbase?

    Leave a comment:


  • minestrone
    replied
    Originally posted by Moscow Mule View Post
    Nope, it's a lot more convenient to have mechanised divisions in Germany where there's lots of room to play rather than having them cooped up on Salisbury Plain.
    What about the 3,200 in Cyprus? There for the sun and wine?

    Leave a comment:


  • threaded
    replied
    Originally posted by Moscow Mule View Post
    Like that waste of 8 chinooks sat in a hanger because no ****er would certify the software so they had to downgrade them?
    Well, that's what happens when one fails to employ experienced contractors and trust detail to a bunch of civil savants.

    Leave a comment:


  • Moscow Mule
    replied
    Originally posted by minestrone View Post
    Are we still expecting the Ruskies to storm over the border?
    Nope, it's a lot more convenient to have mechanised divisions in Germany where there's lots of room to play rather than having them cooped up on Salisbury Plain.

    Leave a comment:


  • ratewhore
    replied
    Originally posted by minestrone View Post
    I was reading in the Times this morning that we still have 19,000 troops in Germany and 10,000 in Afghanistan. Are we still expecting the Ruskies to storm over the border?
    I don't think the infrastructure exists in the UK to house the units from Germany.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X