Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
It's still happening to Nazis, isn't it? Or did they finally get to punish all the doddering old men? That was over 50 years ago!
That's not the same - you confuse retrospective stuff (making a crime something that wasn't) with lack of maximum period of time after which crime can't be pursued.
I have not come across with historical information on Nazies avoided/evaded paying income taxes, that certainly wasn't one of their biggest crimes in any case.
Why can't there be other kinds of retrospective legislation. The kind that could see ex Prime Ministers and Presidents tried for war crimes after their terms in office, for example.
It's still happening to Nazis, isn't it? Or did they finally get to punish all the doddering old men? That was over 50 years ago!
A scary precedent was set today. On the lengthy and often mind numbingly dull journey home this evening it set me thinking.
Why can't there be other kinds of retrospective legislation. The kind that could see ex Prime Ministers and Presidents tried for war crimes after their terms in office, for example.
There won't be as it doesn't make any money, but still, that's the kind of retrospective legislation that I would like to see.
A scary precedent was set today. On the lengthy and often mind numbingly dull journey home this evening it set me thinking.
Why can't there be other kinds of retrospective legislation. The kind that could see ex Prime Ministers and Presidents tried for war crimes after their terms in office, for example.
Their won't be as it doesn't make any money, but still, that's the kind of retrospective legislation that I would like to see.
I'm not normally known for my pedantry, but this inexcusable !
A scary precedent was set today. On the lengthy and often mind numbingly dull journey home this evening it set me thinking.
Why can't there be other kinds of retrospective legislation. The kind that could see ex Prime Ministers and Presidents tried for war crimes after their terms in office, for example.
There won't be as it doesn't make any money, but still, that's the kind of retrospective legislation that I would like to see.
Leave a comment: