MMR Doctor acted "dishonestly and irresponsibly"

[TheFaQQer]

he was railroaded out of town at a scary speed.

Indeed - it's only taken a mere 12 years to expose him! I'm sure that he just forgot to mention in his "research" that he was being paid to testify that MMR causes Autism - something that had absolutely no impact whatsoever on the outcome of the research.

The other doctors that co-published the paper have now disowned the research.

[threaded]

However no one has properly explained the rise in Autism that has happened recently.

MMR jab... He was right, but for the wrong reasons.

[Moscow Mule]

However no one has properly explained the rise in Autism that has happened recently.

Better diagnosis?

[vetran]

Scapegoat

Scaring parents so that they didn't take the poorly tested MMR jab and had the temerity to ask for tried & tested single injections instead. That didn't happen because the government thought they were too expensive and couldn't buy them with a backhander / directorship from their friendly drug firm? So was he wholly resonsible for reduced immunisations?

FTFY.

Possibly he was wrong (I'm not knowledgeable enough to comment) but he was railroaded out of town at a scary speed. Surprised he didn't get found in some woods with half a tablet in him looking like an extra from True Blood.

I was quite suspicious of everyones motives at the time. Of course his studies were funded by people with vested interests alll studies are.

Now if he had studied the links between MMR & Global warming he would have got a government grant especially if they could raise taxes because of it. The report that suggests 1 cigarette a day reduces alzheimers risk wasn't likely to be funded by ASH was it?

However no one has properly explained the rise in Autism that has happened recently.

[TykeMerc]

Now they've concluded he was dishonest rather than just stupid.

Which should see him banged up for a very long time if there's any justice.

All 3 diseases can be very serious with permanent effects and scaring some parents so that they denied their children immunisation is utterly unforgivable.

I can't remember has he been struck off the medical register yet?

Edit : Just read the report properly, apparently he's working in the USA.

[TheFaQQer]

It's long been known that his conclusions were wrong.
(see Ben Goldacre's "Bad Science" for how this has been proved)

Now they've concluded he was dishonest rather than just stupid.

IIRC, the press coverage gets a detailed examination in Flat Earth News as well.

[Platypus]

It's long been known that his conclusions were wrong.
(see Ben Goldacre's "Bad Science" for how this has been proved)

Now they've concluded he was dishonest rather than just stupid.

[EternalOptimist]

I think that there's already been a number of studies that show that the conclusions that they drew don't hold water at all.

they are in double sh 1te then

[TheFaQQer]

Now that its been shown their methods were wrong, will there be an investigation into whether their conclusions/findings hold water ?

I think that there's already been a number of studies that show that the conclusions that they drew don't hold water at all.

[EternalOptimist]

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/8483865.stm



No doubt the Daily Mail will be publishing a front page article tomorrow about how safe it is.....

Now that its been shown their methods were wrong, will there be an investigation into whether their conclusions/findings hold water ?

and why do these things take so blooming long ?

[Churchill]

What has this got to do with Tax Avoidance?

[AtW]

Why it took them 12 years to establish it?

[TheFaQQer]

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/8483865.stm

The doctor who first suggested a link between MMR vaccinations and autism acted unethically, the official medical regulator has found.

Dr Andrew Wakefield's 1998 Lancet study caused vaccination rates to plummet, resulting in a rise in measles - but the findings were later discredited.

The General Medical Council ruled he had acted "dishonestly and irresponsibly" in doing his research.

No doubt the Daily Mail will be publishing a front page article tomorrow about how safe it is.....