Originally posted by Churchill
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Edlington attack - no comments
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Edlington attack - no comments"
Collapse
-
It seems the judge in the case has been refused access to the social service report on the attackers. Read into this what you will, but it seems history is repeating itself:
The BBC has revealed that a shortened report that will be published after the boys are sentenced removes references to “very serious shortcomings” by care professionals and a failure “to comply with legal duties”.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by TonyEnglish View PostI read somewhere this morning that they will be out before they are 18
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by DaveB View PostThey wern't done for attempted murder partly because at the time of the assault they were below the age of criminal responcibility and partly because burden of proof for a murder charge is higher than that for assault/gbh/abh with intent.
This does not mean that they will not get substantial sentances. The only differance between a convition for murder and a conviction for another aussault is the minimum tariff set for sentancing, it does not affect the maximum sentance the judge can impose.
Just because they were not convivcted of murder does not mean they will not get a long sentance. Indeed the psychiatric reports of the younger of the two indicate that he is a seriously disturbed individual who will pose a significant threat to the public in future and he is likely to get a sentance of life or close to it in a secure hospital.
I would expect to see sentances of between 20-30 years and Life, with parole conditional on satisfactory psychatric evaluations.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by TonyEnglish View Posthttp://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/s...re/8472265.stm
Quite frankly I cannot understand why these two were not done for attempted murder.
This does not mean that they will not get substantial sentances. The only differance between a convition for murder and a conviction for another aussault is the minimum tariff set for sentancing, it does not affect the maximum sentance the judge can impose.
Just because they were not convivcted of murder does not mean they will not get a long sentance. Indeed the psychiatric reports of the younger of the two indicate that he is a seriously disturbed individual who will pose a significant threat to the public in future and he is likely to get a sentance of life or close to it in a secure hospital.
I would expect to see sentances of between 20-30 years and Life, with parole conditional on satisfactory psychatric evaluations.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by zeitghostLucky colonies, getting our psychos.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by TonyEnglish View PostQuite frankly I cannot understand why these two were not done for attempted murder.
Not a satisfactory explanation, methinks. When the two victims are older, I suspect they will not be satisfied.
Leave a comment:
-
Another few years the boys will be released, given new lives, jobs and flown off to Canada/Australia.
Sound familiar?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by TonyEnglish View Posthttp://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/s...re/8472265.stm
Quite frankly I cannot understand why these two were not done for attempted murder.
Leave a comment:
-
scum
should be shot
as should there quite evidently pointless parents.
in fact even better lets just take them into a wood kick the tulip out of them and leave them to die.
Leave a comment:
-
Edlington attack - no comments
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/s...re/8472265.stm
Quite frankly I cannot understand why these two were not done for attempted murder.Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Secondary NI threshold sinking to £5,000: a limited company director’s explainer Dec 24 09:51
- Reeves sets Spring Statement 2025 for March 26th Dec 23 09:18
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
- Accounting for Contractors Dec 19 15:30
- Chartered Accountants with MarchMutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants with March Mutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants Dec 19 15:05
- Unfairly barred from contracting? Petrofac just paid the price Dec 19 09:43
- An IR35 case law look back: contractor must-knows for 2025-26 Dec 18 09:30
- A contractor’s Autumn Budget financial review Dec 17 10:59
Leave a comment: