• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: Qt

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Qt"

Collapse

  • swamp
    replied
    People are paid just enough money so that they don't leave.

    A solider can't leave, so normal rules don't apply.

    If MPs were paid less they'd all leave and make money doing after dinner speeches.

    Leave a comment:


  • Tarquin Farquhar
    replied
    Originally posted by Moscow Mule View Post
    Good question that a politician will never answer, from a woman has lost her son in Afghan...

    "Why is your salary, Mr Rammel, so much more than a soldier putting his life on the line?"
    Why are you paid more than a cleaner?

    Leave a comment:


  • wurzel
    replied
    I couldn't believe the way that, on 3 separate occassions after she spoke, Paddy Ashdown and Piers Morgan patronized the Respect woman .

    "I don't agree with a word you are saying but I think you state your case with a lot of passion and do it very coherently and eloquently. My, I had no idea you ragheads could speak English so well!"

    They may as well have just patted her on the head. Not that I agreed with what she was saying or anything.

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    I getted pissed off with the constant moaning about MPs. As if no-one had ever voted for them.

    Leave a comment:


  • cailin maith
    replied
    Originally posted by minestrone View Post
    There are only, 690? people in the country that will get to be an MP, anyone with half a brain can join the army.

    They join up knowing the risks, I do get a bit pissed off with the persistent moaning of the bereaved.

    If you go to a casino and lose do not blame anyone.
    I agree they do join up, knowing the risks. However, the country had a duty of care to the armed forces. If the Government wants them to fight a war, they should at least provide them with the equipment and tools to do that job.

    Leave a comment:


  • RichardCranium
    replied
    Originally posted by Moscow Mule View Post
    Good question that a politician will never answer, from a woman has lost her son in Afghan...

    "Why is your salary, Mr Rammel, so much more than a soldier putting his life on the line?"
    It's because soldiers get heavily subsidised rations and meals whereas MPs ... oh yeah. I forgot the sumptuous meals at the Commons are only about £1.

    It's because soldiers get accommodation at home provided at subsidised rates whereas MPs ... oh yeah, I forgot about the 2nd homes.

    It's because soldiers get given uniforms to wear whereas the rules on expenses prevent MPs from claiming for clothes ... oh yeah, I forgot about their expenses rules being so generous.

    It's because soldiers are actually trained properly to look after themselves whereas the MPs are undefended ... oh yeah, I forgot about the armed Police guards and Diplomatic Protection Squad.

    It's because soldiers are properly equipped to defend themselves whereas MPs are unprotected ... oh yeah, I forgot about the drivers and free limosines and free hotel accommodation and clamp downs on security whenever MPs gather.

    It's because soldiers have a reputation for drunkeness and debauched behaviour whereas MPs ... oh yeah, I forgot about the MPs and their lying under oath and screwing around and drug-taking.

    It's because soldiers don't have to be on the front line 12 months a year whereas MPs have to ... oh yeah, I forgot the Commons is only open for 33 weeks a year and squaddies are on call 24x7.

    Hmm.

    "Why is your salary, Mr Rammel, so much more than a soldier putting his life on the line?"

    It's because MPs determine their own salary.

    Leave a comment:


  • Moscow Mule
    replied
    That was my point, it's obvious why you can't pay soldiers as much as an MP. You've got two hopes of getting a politician to admit it though...

    Leave a comment:


  • minestrone
    replied
    There are only, 690? people in the country that will get to be an MP, anyone with half a brain can join the army.

    They join up knowing the risks, I do get a bit pissed off with the persistent moaning of the bereaved.

    If you go to a casino and lose do not blame anyone.

    Leave a comment:


  • Moscow Mule
    started a topic Qt

    Qt

    Good question that a politician will never answer, from a woman has lost her son in Afghan...

    "Why is your salary, Mr Rammel, so much more than a soldier putting his life on the line?"
Working...
X