• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Naive Beliefs that have been Exploded in the Noughties"

Collapse

  • EternalOptimist
    replied
    Originally posted by Spacecadet View Post
    Actually, once you get away from climate change this is still the case.
    But then with the politicisation of the climate change issue, I do feel that the scientists are being forced into talking in more absolute terms than then usually do. Any other area of new scientific research (and climatology is relatively new and massively complex) and the scientists are a lot more humble, a lot more dismissive of any suggestions that an accurate model or result will be found at all let alone soon.
    There was a good example of this on Material World yesterday afternoon, the lady had been drilling in earthquake zones was pretty sceptical of them ever being able to get to a stage where they could forcast earthquakes.
    Spot on. Some think I was naive, but I would like them to consider the principled stand taken by members of the drugs advisory group that resigned a few weeks ago.



    Leave a comment:


  • Spacecadet
    replied
    Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Post
    2. Belief. Scientists follow the scientific model and only a very few will allow glory, fame or greed distort their efforts.
    Actually, once you get away from climate change this is still the case.
    But then with the politicisation of the climate change issue, I do feel that the scientists are being forced into talking in more absolute terms than then usually do. Any other area of new scientific research (and climatology is relatively new and massively complex) and the scientists are a lot more humble, a lot more dismissive of any suggestions that an accurate model or result will be found at all let alone soon.
    There was a good example of this on Material World yesterday afternoon, the lady had been drilling in earthquake zones was pretty sceptical of them ever being able to get to a stage where they could forcast earthquakes.

    Leave a comment:


  • RichardCranium
    replied
    Originally posted by gingerjedi View Post
    Hmm I don't trust the 'tweenies' they look a bit dodgy
    I don't blame you. I'm a bit worried about bobhope-the-furry-fan who describes someone in a doggy costume as looking really 'hot'.

    Leave a comment:


  • gingerjedi
    replied
    Originally posted by bobhope View Post
    no, sounds too much like the "tweenies"


    "Hey Hey! What do you say! It's time to come and play with The Tweenies! Hey, hey are you ready to play! So don't you wanna play with "The Tweenies."

    It must be really hot in that dog costume.
    Hmm I don't trust the 'tweenies' they look a bit dodgy, "Yoko! Jakamoko! Toto!" is our new fav.

    Leave a comment:


  • RichardCranium
    replied
    Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
    2010s sounds okay, but is a bit long-winded. I wonder how they tackled this sticky problem (mod 100) years ago.
    They had a big war and forgot about the naming problem.

    Leave a comment:


  • Scary
    replied
    A decade ago I thought we'd all be playing Duke Nukem Forever in the next year or 2.

    Leave a comment:


  • EternalOptimist
    replied
    Originally posted by Scary View Post
    A decade ago EternalOptimist was very naïve.
    I think he was trying to find a common thread through these three great ideas, that are not performing as is intended. He was probably fishing for something like
    'The decade when trust finally broke down'




    Leave a comment:


  • eliquant
    replied
    To me 2000- 2010 has been the decade of false confidence and double standards.

    Leave a comment:


  • bobhope
    replied
    It's a good post, but I can't help feeling that it's more a question of getting older, gaining more experience and (hopefully) wisdom, rather than a product of the decade.

    I remember years ago, naively thinking that banks and financial institutions would act in my best interest. Well maybe not in my best interest, but at least not actively try to screw me over.

    Hahaha, how I laugh now.

    Leave a comment:


  • bobhope
    replied
    Originally posted by NickFitz View Post
    The Teenies, probably

    Remember, you heard it here first...
    no, sounds too much like the "tweenies"


    "Hey Hey! What do you say! It's time to come and play with The Tweenies! Hey, hey are you ready to play! So don't you wanna play with "The Tweenies."

    It must be really hot in that dog costume.

    Leave a comment:


  • threaded
    replied
    Originally posted by Scary View Post
    A decade ago EternalOptimist was very naïve.
    WHS++

    Leave a comment:


  • Scary
    replied
    A decade ago EternalOptimist was very naïve.

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    Originally posted by NickFitz View Post
    The Teenies, probably
    According to Wiki and AskOxford 'teen' corresponds to the numerals between 13 and 19, though it does derive from ten according to the latter. Teenies doesn't sound quite right either. But then again neither does tens and tenties. 2010s sounds okay, but is a bit long-winded. I wonder how they tackled this sticky problem (mod 100) years ago.

    Leave a comment:


  • Tingles
    replied
    Why couldn't we have engineered a Y2.01K problem?

    Leave a comment:


  • NickFitz
    replied
    Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
    Flip, where did that decade go. And what are they going to call the tenties?
    The Teenies, probably

    Remember, you heard it here first...

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X