If a terrorist wants to send a message it is easy to encrypt it, even a five year old could do it.
Message on a jpeg made into a text file and then split and sent in sections along with other junk. Impossible to crack.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Do you agree...
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Do you agree..."
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Doggy Styles View PostYes, I do agree.
Nobody here can know that we don't need this, because nobody here is doing that work. And if they were, they wouldn't be opining about it on here.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Churchill View Post...with the following statement?
Nobody here can know that we don't need this, because nobody here is doing that work. And if they were, they wouldn't be opining about it on here.
Leave a comment:
-
If you want an even more accurate prediction about state surveillance, watch Senator Frank Church on Meet The Press from August 1975:
[America’s intelligence gathering] capability at any time could be turned around on the American people and no American would have any privacy left. Such is the capability to monitor everything: telephone conversations, telegrams, it doesn’t matter. There would be no place to hide.
If this government ever became a tyrant, if a dictator ever took charge in this country, the technological capacity that the intelligence community has given the government could enable it to impose total tyranny, and there would be no way to fight back because the most careful effort to combine together in resistance to the government, no matter how privately it was done, is within the reach of the government to know. Such is the capability of this technology.
I don’t want to see this country ever go across the bridge. I know the capacity that is there to make tyranny total in America, and we must see to it that [the NSA] and all agencies that possess this technology operate within the law and under proper supervision so that we never cross over that abyss. That is the abyss from which there is no return.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by TheFaQQer View PostAt least if it's a developer role, you have the chance to bring the system down from within
I spent a while umming and ahing about whether to take the role or not, and decided that I would end up unhappy with what I was doing, so turned it down. One of the reasons I don't work for a large consultancy any more is that I didn't want to be forced into working on projects like that.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Churchill View PostThat's what's going through my mind. It's a developer role.
I spent a while umming and ahing about whether to take the role or not, and decided that I would end up unhappy with what I was doing, so turned it down. One of the reasons I don't work for a large consultancy any more is that I didn't want to be forced into working on projects like that.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by TheFaQQer View PostWe'll make a contractor of you yet
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by cailin maith View PostWho cares - it's going to be done by someone anyway?
It's a matter of individual choice - when I found out who the client was (they were more than a little secretive about exactly who they were and what they did), I wasn't interested in the role at all. It just didn't square with my conscience, and I wanted no part of it.
Just because someone is going to be doing it, doesn't mean that I should compromise what I believe in.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by darmstadt View Post
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Secondary NI threshold sinking to £5,000: a limited company director’s explainer Yesterday 09:51
- Reeves sets Spring Statement 2025 for March 26th Dec 23 09:18
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
- Accounting for Contractors Dec 19 15:30
- Chartered Accountants with MarchMutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants with March Mutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants Dec 19 15:05
- Unfairly barred from contracting? Petrofac just paid the price Dec 19 09:43
- An IR35 case law look back: contractor must-knows for 2025-26 Dec 18 09:30
- A contractor’s Autumn Budget financial review Dec 17 10:59
Leave a comment: