Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Agent called and said that a contract at a bank can only be done 'on payroll' because they've had a visit from the taxman and the role is not for a predefined project; that means effectively that I would earn half my rate and have no means to subtract business costs from tax. I know this is going on all over the EU now, and it's f**&*(^(*king scandalous. Effectively the tax authorities are impeding competition by ensuring the job's only profitable for people who live nextdoor to clientco; this is supposed to be 'free trade and competition'.
My Government will legislate to provide agency workers with the right to be treated equally with permanent staff on pay, holidays and other basic conditions.
Yep, it's in there right after abolishing child poverty and before constitutional reform
Yep. And the trouble is, I´m tied to that agency for this client as I worked at that client less than a year ago via this agent. Could solve it by phoning another agent, but then the competition clause hits home.
Yep. And the trouble is, I´m tied to that agency for this client as I worked at that client less than a year ago via this agent. Could solve it by phoning another agent, but then the competition clause hits home.
NEWS. I asked agent if I can do the job as employee of family's Ltd in Britain. This LTD has 5 employees. Agent says 'no, were not allowed to do business with a British LTD.' Why, I asked, seeing as Holland and UK are both EUSSR member states and surely 'free trade' rules apply?
Agent says 'it's just not allowed' and quotes tax laws bla bla bla.
Well that would be quite big news if it was true, seeing as Britain exports over 17bn worth of goods and services to the Netherlands each year.
NEWS. I asked agent if I can do the job as employee of family's Ltd in Britain. This LTD has 5 employees. Agent says 'no, were not allowed to do business with a British LTD.' Why, I asked, seeing as Holland and UK are both EUSSR member states and surely 'free trade' rules apply?
Agent says 'it's just not allowed' and quotes tax laws bla bla bla.
Well that would be quite big news if it was true, seeing as Britain exports over 17bn worth of goods and services to the Netherlands each year.
There's all sorts of funny rules going on with banks and headcounts etc at the moment due to deals done with the FSA and banks disguising contractors via various 'managed services' schemes. This sounds like one such scheme.
Oh they're involved as well. The FSA. Fat lot of good they were, so now they're going to busy themselves with stuff that's completely irrelevant to proper banking practise.
Leave a comment: