• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Swine flu cases drop in England"

Collapse

  • TimberWolf
    replied
    I like how children are classified as "super-spreaders". Or dirty little oiks in common parlance.

    Leave a comment:


  • minestrone
    replied
    I get the low down on this subject from the top and believe me it is not the doctors that press the panic button. It seems that you are forming this response from what you have read in the papers and not what the doctors have been saying all along... "Let's just see how it goes but we are prepared for the worst, we do not think that it will be bad"

    They tried to get the press to give it up ( I know that for a fact ) but when the press are screaming millions will die and then they don't you have to ask yourself who got it wrong? Who got it right?

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    Originally posted by PM-Junkie View Post
    I am curious, it is possible for you to contribute to ANY threads without being offensive? What a sad existence you must lead if this is all you can do to get your jollies.

    Anyway, I read the phrase "But experts warned against assuming the pandemic had peaked, saying it could be a "half-term effect" - flu rates tend to be higher when schools are open." Hence my "but...but...but" comment.
    I contribute to many threads without being offensive but I must admit to a lack of patience with idiotic conclusions - something that seems rife on this forum where the most unaccomplished/ill educated individuals pontificate on questions of e.g. epidemiology without the least idea of the discipline involved.

    But I stand corrected. I suppose I ought to be more patient - one can't help one's genetic attributes and/or poor education.

    HTH

    Leave a comment:


  • PM-Junkie
    replied
    Originally posted by sasguru View Post
    Are you reading a different article from me? Or is it just a problem of poor education/low IQ?

    That article says there's been an expected downward blip due to half-term. And the graph shows medium term the rise has not stopped.

    HTH
    I am curious, it is possible for you to contribute to ANY threads without being offensive? What a sad existence you must lead if this is all you can do to get your jollies.

    Anyway, I read the phrase "But experts warned against assuming the pandemic had peaked, saying it could be a "half-term effect" - flu rates tend to be higher when schools are open." Hence my "but...but...but" comment.

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    Originally posted by PM-Junkie View Post
    linky

    Summary of the explanation from the experts - "but...but...but....no, wait".
    Are you reading a different article from me? Or is it just a problem of poor education/low IQ?

    That article says there's been an expected downward blip due to half-term. And the graph shows medium term the rise has not stopped.

    HTH

    Leave a comment:


  • PM-Junkie
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    Or perhaps we should count ourselves lucky rather than complaining. The chances are something particularly nasty will appear one of these years, and modern travel patterns probably mean it'll be virtually impossible to contain.

    Swine flu was a fascinating opportunity to observe the spread of a new disease, and (as it turned out) a chance to have a dry run for something more vicious next time.
    A fair point...but the problem is that if something nasty does come along, governments will have cried wolf so often, and/or spun things like swine flu and bird flu so often (to take attention away from things they would rather not have people focus on) - that the likely reaction from the masses will be "yeah right, pull the other one".

    Leave a comment:


  • threaded
    replied
    Co-incidence time, but me and girly have just got our invites for government flu shots. They're giving them out in priority order here. I'm booked for early tomorrow morning, girly is week 5, 2010.

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Or perhaps we should count ourselves lucky rather than complaining. The chances are something particularly nasty will appear one of these years, and modern travel patterns probably mean it'll be virtually impossible to contain.

    Swine flu was a fascinating opportunity to observe the spread of a new disease, and (as it turned out) a chance to have a dry run for something more vicious next time.

    Leave a comment:


  • PM-Junkie
    started a topic Swine flu cases drop in England

    Swine flu cases drop in England

    linky

    Summary of the explanation from the experts - "but...but...but....no, wait".

    The hype of the decade perhaps, or was it bird flu? Or WMDs?

Working...
X