Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
I saw the problem on the Cosmic Variance physics blog yesterday.
Many, if not most, of the comments are scientists (who one assumes are reasonably smart) 'fessing up one after another that they jumped to the wrong conclusion. So we're in good company.
how on earth can you assume they are all facing the same way in a line ?
one of the statii is unknown = null
I will show my bum out of the window if I am wrong
It doesn't matter if they are in a line or not - the situation is that A is looking at B and B is looking at C. Even if C is looking at A, it's irrelevant.
Leave a comment: