Originally posted by Evil Hangover
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Hit and run Harman
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Hit and run Harman"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by minestrone View PostAgain, are you on here as a wind up?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by minestrone View PostBeing Deputy Leader of the Labour Party if someone decided to shot Gordon she would get the job of running the country.
Originally posted by minestrone View PostWith that I can say she is the 2nd most senior politician in the country.
Originally posted by minestrone View PostI mean FFS, do they not give you lot some kind of citizenship exams?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by AtW View PostShe is certainly not 2nd.
I am talking about chauffeur here specifically. Why would she need one? She is not the Queen or the PM or anyone who'd need to be driven on official occasions. Though on the other hand given how badly she drives maybe she should have one - it would make roads safer.
I mean FFS, do they not give you lot some kind of citizenship exams? Can we not add numeracy exams to that as well? Jesus wept.
Again, are you on here as a wind up?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by minestrone View PostShe may be a stupid cow but she is (in theory) the 2nd most senior politician in the country at the moment.
Originally posted by minestrone View PostYou just want her to head down the high street and flag the bus?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by AtW View PostShe should use public transport more - after all it was her Govt that screwed over motorists to pay for public transport, why is she driving in the first place?
Chauffeur is expensive (will cost more per annum than her car), and is completely unnecessary - she is not PM.
Do you just come on here to prove you are thick? Is it a bet or something?
Leave a comment:
-
This happened 3 months ago. The daily mail picks it up the day before the tory conference, hmm ...
Shoddy journalism anyone? I can't stand Harman, she's beyond inept, but I bet this story fizzles out once recollections over the actual facts of the case emerge
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by d000hg View PostShe does a LOT of travelling. And why shouldn't she have a chauffeur anyway? What are your suggestions for the rights to such luxury?
Chauffeur is expensive (will cost more per annum than her car), and is completely unnecessary - she is not PM.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by d000hg View PostI don't see why she shouldn't have a chauffeur-driven car, but get a decent car in that case!Originally posted by AtW View PostWhy should she? And even if she does then she should be paying Benefit in Kind tax on these services.
Leave a comment:
-
Churchill wrote : After you.
Oh I possibly couldn't.
Ladies first and all that.
Please lead the way.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Board Game Geek View PostThat reminds me of a story I heard at one of the sites where I was working.
2 secretaries were chatting, and one asked the other how her 82 year old Mum was.
The other replied that she was holding up, after the Police visit.
I carried on working, listening in to their idle chat, and it transpired that the poor old dear had clipped a parked car in her street and not realised it.
The owner (a neighbour) of the vehicle saw the incident, and instead of having a polite chat, he phone the cops and reported her as leaving the scene of a crime.
3 weeks later, 4 rather large burly coppers banged on her front door one night at 10.30 pm, getting her out of bed.
She opened the door in her nightie, and they said that they needed to come in and chat about a crime.
The poor dear was beside herself, thinking that one of her daughters or grandkids had been murdered.
They explained that 3 weeks ago, she had been witnessed leaving the scene of a crime, in which a vehicle was damaged.
They explained that this was a very serious crime, and would undoubtedly lead to a hefty fine, points on her licence, and quite possibly a custodial sentence.
The poor old girl was completely terrified, never having been involved with the police before, and being woken up at such a late hour by 4 burly coppers.
They did try and take her to the station for fingerprinting and DNA (which she didn't even know what that was, but they said it was part of her body or something, which helped matters no end).
She asked if they were arresting her, and they replied "not at this stage", so in tears she rang her daughter who arrived, managed to get the coppers out of the house, and she spent the night with her mum, calming her down.
The last I heard, is that the daughter recommended that her mother and the owner of the vehicle come to some arrangement in which she pays for the 2" scuff mark on his rear bumper. The garage have said that they will have to replace the whole bumper for £800.
I definitely feel that the response by the police was completely disproportionate to the crime committed, especially by a senior citizen, and to approach their investigation in such a heavy-handed manner has caused unnecessary stress and suffering.
I do wonder if the police are human at all sometimes, or completely devoid of any intellience or training to deal sympathetically with an old lady, let alone catch criminals.
Still, it's got to be easier to terrorise an old lady than god forbid patrol the high street at pub closing time.
Is this what we have to look forward to when we get old ?
Solution :
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Yesterday 21:16
- IR35: Substitution — updated for 2025/26 Yesterday 05:45
- Payment request to bust recruitment agency — free template Sep 16 21:04
- Why licensing umbrella companies must be key to 2027’s regulation Sep 16 13:55
- Top 5 Chapter 11 JSL myths contractors should know Sep 15 03:46
- Top 5 Chapter 11 JSL myths contractors should know Sep 14 15:46
- What the housing market needs at Autumn Budget 2025 Sep 10 20:58
- Qdos hit by cybersecurity ‘attack’ Sep 10 01:01
- Why party conference season 2025 is a self-employment policy litmus test Sep 9 09:53
- Labour decommissions Freelance Commissioner idea Sep 8 08:56
Leave a comment: