- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: If I can come back, we can come back
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "If I can come back, we can come back"
Collapse
-
Don't fuss so, the system of government in the UK is going to change quite dramatically within the next few months.
-
I couldn't agree more, well said that Gunman.Originally posted by The Lone Gunman View PostIt beggars belief that "he" managed to come back!!!
They had to manufacture a place in the HOL so he could come back as part to Govt FFS.
It should be bloody illegal.
We should only be Governed by those we have elected. The upper house should be reserved as a place to provide checks and balances to stop a Government getting out of hand.
Leave a comment:
-
So, in government we'd have a load of career politicians who know nothing about the real world and only care about electing their party, supervised by a load of failed career politicians who know nothing about the real world and only care about electing their party.Originally posted by NotAllThere View PostHow about those that come second in the election get a seat in the HoL? It would be nicely balanced then, and gets over the problem of having an unelected second chamber.
Sounds like a recipe for something...
Leave a comment:
-
-
It would be funny if at the next election they did come third. So Brown, after shafting the nation would also shaft his own party so much that at PMQ they only get their 2 questions
Leave a comment:
-
Errrr:-Originally posted by HairyArsedBloke View Post'king 'ell. So instead of nearly 650 bastards living it up up at taxpayers expense, there would be nearly 1300 of 'em.
As of July 2009 the House of Lords has 740 members, 94 more than the 646-seat House of Commons.
Originally posted by HairyArsedBloke View PostI'm glad I'm not paying for it.
Leave a comment:
-
'king 'ell. So instead of nearly 650 bastards living it up up at taxpayers expense, there would be nearly 1300 of 'em.
I'm glad I'm not paying for it.
Leave a comment:
-
That's an interesting idea. Imagine if for each left wing MP there would be a right wing House of Lords member and vice versa. It has merits as a means of providing checks and balances, particularly when one party has an overwhelming majority in the House of Commons.Originally posted by NotAllThere View PostHow about those that come second in the election get a seat in the HoL? It would be nicely balanced then, and gets over the problem of having an unelected second chamber.
It would give minority parties a chance too.
Leave a comment:
-
God, yeah, I wish they'd just pick one name and stick to it instead of constantly chopping and changing, like the last time, 21 years ago and before that in 1859. It's so confusing.Originally posted by TimberWolf View Postbehind the Liberals (or whatever they are calling themselves now).
Leave a comment:
-
-
I am starting to think he is one of those 6 foot high lizards that Dave Icke bangs on about. The guy is pure self-serving slime IMHO
Leave a comment:
-
How about those that come second in the election get a seat in the HoL? It would be nicely balanced then, and gets over the problem of having an unelected second chamber.
Leave a comment:
-
It beggars belief that "he" managed to come back!!!
They had to manufacture a place in the HOL so he could come back as part to Govt FFS.
It should be bloody illegal.
We should only be Governed by those we have elected. The upper house should be reserved as a place to provide checks and balances to stop a Government getting out of hand.
Leave a comment:
-
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- IT contractor demand lunged towards growth in April 2026 May 13 04:48
- What does PGMOL’s win over HMRC mean for contractors? May 12 07:25
- Contractors eyeing mortgages ‘unrealistic about BoE’s 3.75% hold decision’ May 11 07:50
- The fake job problem is getting worse. Are contractors a particularly easy target? May 8 07:49
- Government policy on freelancing is stopping the contractor model from doing its thing May 7 08:12
- Contractors, can the new HMRC loan charge settlement opportunity reduce your bill? May 6 07:51
- PGMOL’s ‘not finely balanced’ win over HMRC could be ‘persuasive’ in IR35 cases May 5 07:10
- Is Reporting Company Payments to Participators a concerning consultation for contractors? Apr 29 07:38
- Now it’s finally here, how is HMRC Joint & Several Liability risk being managed, and is payment control the holy grail? Apr 28 06:55
- How Managed Service Providers (MSPs) are hit by HMRC’s Joint & Several Liability Apr 27 06:08


Leave a comment: